Interview: Why Is Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Being Ignored?

On June 11, 2021, I joined host Bernadette Pajer on An Informed Life Radio to discuss how the public is being lied to in order to push the political and financial agenda of achieving a high vaccination rate for COVID-19, including through the deliberate omission of natural immunity from policy guidelines, which clearly illuminates the real agenda being served. Topics we discussed include:

• Bernadette read the following from the About page of my website: “The government perpetually lies to the public about important issues that affect us all. The mainstream media dutifully serve to manipulate public opinion, manufacturing consent for criminal policies that threaten lives and liberty.” She asked for a pre-COVID-19 example, so I illustrated the point with the illegal US war against Iraq launched in 2003.
• I explained how I borrow the term “manufacture consent” from the book by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky titled Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, which describes the “filters” that information goes through explaining how and why the media fulfill the function of issuing state propaganda in democratic societies with a “free press”.
• How one of those filters is “flak”, whereby anyone who dares to speak out against the state religion, of which a subsect is the vaccine religion, is attacked as a heretic.
• How blatant lies are being widely propagated by the mass media while truths are censored.
• How one good thing that has happened is a mass awakening to the existence of this censorship, which had been happening since well before COVID-19.
• How my next major article will be on what we know about natural immunity and why the arguments that people who are already immune still need to get a COVID-19 vaccine are fallacious and deceitful.
• How research has now indicated that the mRNA from COVID-19 vaccines doesn’t stay at the injection site but is transported throughout the body, and the spike protein produced by the cells as a result of the injection gets into the bloodstream.
• How governments, such as the state government here in Michigan, are lying that these vaccines have gone through the same process of safety testing as licensed vaccines, with no steps being skipped, whereas the FDA itself explicitly states on its fact sheets for providers and recipients that these vaccines have not undergone the same type of review as FDA approved vaccines.
• How public health officials have a double standard for determining causality: if deaths occur after people received a positive PCR test, they are counted as “COVID-19” deaths, whereas if deaths occur after people received a COVID-19 vaccine, they insist that it is just a coincidence.
• How the CDC is communicating to the public that it is acceptable to lower the standards of evidence for COVID-19 vaccine safety specifically for pregnant women—which is insane and criminal.
• How the CDC mischaracterizes its own cited studies to support its policy recommendations, such as trying to support its claim that it is safe for pregnant women to get flu shots by citing studies of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data that actually found that VAERS data is inadequate for determining safety due to significant underreporting of vaccine-associated adverse events.
• How if the manufacturers of flu shots and Tdap vaccines made the same claims about the safety of vaccinating pregnant women as the CDC, they could be sued for fraud, which is why they state explicitly right in their package inserts that adequate studies have not been done to determine the safety of this practice.
• How it took cease and desist letters from the legal team at Michigan for Vaccine Choice to get the state government to stop lying to the public that the COVID-19 vaccines are FDA “approved”.
• How the agenda being served is illustrated clearly by the fact that the WHO tried quietly to eliminate natural immunity from the definition of herd immunity, as though only people who are vaccinated contribute to the development of population immunity.
• How the agenda is also transparent in the message that people can regain their freedom only by getting vaccinated, whereas even people who are already naturally immune are still being told that they need to wear masks and comply with other lockdown measures—as though natural immunity does not exist.
• How the population has become dependent on pharmaceutical products that create cycles of dependency on even more pharmaceutical products.
• Why we need to understand natural immunity as an opportunity cost of vaccination.
• For example, how children whose immune systems were primed by the DTaP vaccine “will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease the increased lifetime susceptibility.”
• How federal regulators were incentivized to downplay any effective treatments for COVID-19 because for vaccines—the development of which the government is heavily invested and partnered in—to be able to get emergency use authorization required that there be no approved treatments available.
• How the public is being lied to that the immunity conferred by vaccines is superior to the immunity conferred by infection with SARS-CoV-2 when the science tells us the opposite.
• Why the argument that naturally immune people should still get vaccinated because it results in a higher level of antibodies in the blood is a logical fallacy and extraordinarily deceptive.
• Why the argument that naturally immune people should still get vaccinated because we don’t know the duration of immunity is also a logical fallacy and extraordinarily deceptive.
• Why the claim that vaccine-conferred immunity offers better protection against variants than natural immunity is a nonsensical lie.