An example of the kind of cognitive dissonance prevalent among priests of the state religion whose function is to manufacture consent for government policy.
Americans’ inability to see the two heads of the beast for what they are is exactly what led the country into a “choice” between Trump or Clinton.
The solutions being proposed for how to “fix” Obamacare are just more of the same kinds of interventions that have caused the problems in the first place.
Not only was it sold to the public on the basis of lies, but notwithstanding the US Supreme Court’s ruling to the contrary, Obamacare is unconstitutional.
The New York Times, rather than doing journalism, prefers to distract attention from Hillary Clinton’s crimes.
Obamacare was sold to the public with the promises of lower premiums and greater competition. It’s no accident that the opposite has occurred.
The New York Times pretends to care about evidence, but applies a completely different standard when it comes to US government claims.
Obamacare supporters naturally blame the market for less competition and rising insurance premiums, despite this being a predictable consequence of the law.
A few examples of the media’s alarmist reporting about climate change and sea level rise versus reality.
A few thoughts on why not voting–no, not even for Bernie Sanders!–is the best thing you can do in the upcoming presidential election.