SARS-CoV-2 Response: Where Do We Go from Here?

In response to the severe acute respiratory syndrom coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, governments around the world have implemented authoritarian lockdown measures that could easily cause more harm than good in the long run no just in economic terms, but also in terms of health and lives.

Additionally, the systematic violation of individual rights is a cause for serious concern and sets a dangerous precedent.

In the following content, I address the questions of how we got to where we are today and where we go from here. The central question I’ll be focusing on is how we can save the most lives without government interventions doing more harm than good.

SARS-CoV-2 Response: Where Do We Go from Here? (Introduction)

In response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, governments have implemented authoritarian lockdown measures that could easily be doing more harm than good.

SARS-CoV-2 Response: Imperial College Model and Lockdown Endgame

The influential Imperial College model governments have used to justify economic shutdown shows that lockdown only delays and worsens the problem long-term.

COVID-19: What You Need to Know about Fatality Rates

Inherently overestimated COVID-19 fatality rates have created mass fear and panic, manufacturing consent for extreme and harmful authoritarian policies.

Gretchen Whitmer

Interview: Draconian COVID-19 Responses Are an Opportunity for Health Freedom Advocates

I discuss fear versus scientific data in the context of the authoritarian political responses to SARS-CoV-2 with Bretigne Shaffer on her podcast.

Young women running with face coverings despite being outdoors where the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is negligible. (Photo by Mircea Iancu, from Pixabay)

Facebook “Fact Check” Lies about COVID-19 Fatality Rate

A “Fact Check” article cited by Facebook to flag a post as “False” deceives readers about the COVID-19 fatality rate to advocate extreme lockdown policies.

A woman wearing a mask during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

New York Times Laughably Lies That the Mask Debate Is ‘Settled’Facebook “Fact Check” Lies about COVID-19 Fatality Rate

The statist New York Times says science unequivocally supports universal mask use, but its own cited sources illustrate what a ludicrous assertion that is.

COVID-19 mask debate

Interview: COVID-19 and the Great Mask Debate

In this interview, I explain why universal mask-wearing orders aren’t evidence-based and the limited circumstances in which wearing a mask would make sense.

coronavirus fecal transmission

Does SARS-CoV-2 Spread Through Poop? Fact Checking the NY Times

The New York Times claims there’s “growing evidence” that fecal transmission of the novel coronavirus occurs, but the science says otherwise.

Anthony Fauci - COVID-19

Interview: Fact-Checking the ‘Fact-Checkers’ on COVID-19

In this interview, I discuss how the media are deceiving the public about COVID-19 to advocate extreme lockdown policies that do more harm than good.
Coronavirus Asymptomatic Transmission

How CNN Deceives about Asymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

CNN claims that the novel coronavirus is being spread largely by people with no symptoms, but this narrative is belied by its own primary sources.
The "Fearless Girl" | SARS-CoV-2 airborne transmission

Study Fraudulently Claims SARS-CoV-2 Is Mainly Airborne

A study claiming to show that SARS-CoV-2 spreads mainly via airborne transmission and that mask-wearing orders work is based on a fraudulent premise.

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This