An example of the kind of cognitive dissonance prevalent among priests of the state religion whose function is to manufacture consent for government policy.
The solutions being proposed for how to “fix” Obamacare are just more of the same kinds of interventions that have caused the problems in the first place.
The New York Times pretends to care about evidence, but applies a completely different standard when it comes to US government claims.
The New York Times advocates increasing the minimum wage while refusing to see the evidence of the harm caused by outlawing jobs.
The US mainstream media serve the role of manufacturing consent for the US policy of supporting Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians.
The New York Times tosses previously reported facts down the memory hole, whitewashing the US’s role in Syria leading ultimately to the rise of ISIS.
The New York Times editors argue that CO2 emissions can be taxed without harming consumers, but in so doing only illustrate their own cognitive dissonance.
The terrorist attacks in Paris, France, have served to manufacture even further consent for the US’s disastrous policy in Syria.
To see how biased the New York Times is, one need look no further than reporting from the Israeli daily Haaretz for comparison.
Isabel Kershner in the New York Times sympathizes with Israelis suffering water shortages without once mentioning how Israel denies water to Palestinians.