...

Reading Progress:

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

Egypt: The Blood on the New York Times’ Editors’ Hands

When the Egyptian military was promising even more violence against demonstrators protesting the coup d'tat that overthrow President Morsi after two previous massacres...

Sep 2, 2013 | 0 comments

When the Egyptian military was promising even more violence against demonstrators protesting the coup d’tat that overthrow President Morsi after two previous massacres, and despite a U.S. law prohibiting foreign aid to any government taking power through a coup, the New York Times editors insisted that “American military aid to Egypt should not be cut off”.

After the generals followed through on their threat to silence the “terrorists” with a claimed “mandate” to do so from supporters of the coup, massacring another reported 1,000 civilians or so, the Times editors finally called on Obama to oppose the generals’ “conduct” by “immediately suspending military aid”.

A welcome reversal. A bit late too late to wash the blood off their hands, though.

Now you know. Others don’t. Share the knowledge.

About the Author

About the Author

I am an independent researcher, journalist, and author dedicated to exposing mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.

I write about critically important issues including US foreign policy, economic policy, and so-called "public health" policies.

My books include Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent.

To learn more about my mission and core values, visit my About page.

Share Your Thoughts

(You can format comments using simple HTML — <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and <blockquote>quoted text</blockquote>)

>
Share via
Copy link