White House: No Irrefutable Evidence Assad Used CW, But Our ‘Sense’ He is Guilty Will Suffice to Bomb Syria

by Sep 12, 2013Foreign Policy0 comments

White House Chief-of-Staff Denis McDonough on CBS’s “Face the Nation” said the government lacks "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" of its declared pretext for war on Syria.

In order for someone to be convicted in court, evidence of guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt" must be presented. But for the U.S. government to drop bombs on another country on the pretext that its government has committed some crime, the bar is much lower.

White House Chief-of-Staff Denis McDonough on CBS’s “Face the Nation” said the government lacks "irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence" of its declared pretext for war on Syria.

As everyone knows, in order for a private individual to be convicted in a court for a crime like, say, murder, evidence of guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt” must be presented.

But for the U.S. government to drop bombs on another country on the pretext that its government has committed some crime (in this case, that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons), the bar is much lower.

Obama’s top aide says the administration lacks “irrefutable, beyond-a-reasonable-doubt evidence” that skeptical Americans, including lawmakers who will start voting on military action this week, are seeking.

“This is not a court of law. And intelligence does not work that way,” White House chief of staff Denis McDonough said, part of his five-network public relations blitz Sunday to build support for limited strikes against Syrian President Bashar Assad.

“The common-sense test says he is responsible for this. He should be held to account,” McDonough said

For the Obama administration, the standard is the “common sense test”, evidently meaning that that it is “common” for U.S. government officials to “sense” that Assad is guilty of using chemical weapons, the same way it was “common” for them to “sense” that Saddam Hussein had WMD, despite the complete lack of evidence.

Of course, sense isn’t too common within government.

And never mind that if Obama attacks Syria, regardless of which party was responsible for using CW in Syria, he will beyond any doubt whatsoever be guilty of committing the crime of aggression, “the supreme international crime”, as defined at Nuremberg.

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I am an independent journalist, political analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal, book author, and writing coach.

My writings empower readers with the knowledge they need to see through state propaganda intended to manufacture their consent for criminal government policies.

By recognizing when we are being lied to and why, we can fight effectively for liberty, peace, and justice, in order to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

Please join my growing community of readers!

 

My Books

Related Articles

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This