...

The FDA, Big Pharma, and Crony Capitalism

The FDA, far from being a government agency with consumers' interest in mind, just serves the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.

by Jeremy R. Hammond

Nov 2, 2013

… read
READING PROGRESS: 0%

I've commented before on how the FDA, far from being a government agency with consumers' interest in mind, in reality just serves the interests of the pharmaceutical industry -- the epitome of crony capitalism. As I mentioned, one way the FDA does this is helping Big Pharma monopolize the market by banning the importation of drugs, thus forcing Americans to pay more for the same product they could get cheaper from manufacturers outside the U.S. I read two notable examples of this cronyism last week.

The first was from the New York Times, which told the story of 71-year-old Lee Higman, who ordered prescription medication from Canada only to have the shipment intercepted and held by the FDA. It cost Higman $100 to buy his meds from Canada, whereas to purchase the same drug in the U.S. would cost him $1,000.

The second was Mark Thornton's personal story at the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Thornton explained how he got the gout in his big toe. The medication he was prescribed, colchicine, was a natural drug that had been used for thousands of years, and yet still cost nearly $200. Why? Because in 2009, the FDA exclusively approved the brand name of the drug, Colcrys, as a treatment for gout, granting an effective monopoly over the sale of colchicine in the U.S. to this brand manufacturer. As Thornton remarks,

Once again government has taken something that was both cheap and beneficial and turned it into a monopoly that hurts the general public and drives up the cost of medical care to the benefit of Big Pharma.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I’m an independent journalist exposing the state propaganda that manufactures public consent for criminal government policies.

My work examines US foreign policy, market interventionism, and so-called "public health" policy through one consistent lens: an uncompromising application of the non-aggression principle that transcends the narrow linear spectrum of "left" vs. "right".

Read about my mission and core values →

Essential Reading

A Palestinian boy and an Israeli soldier by Israel's illegal separation wall in the West Bank. (Justin McIntosh/CC BY 2.0)

Foreign Policy, News & Analysis

The Path to Peace Lies In Rejecting the ‘Peace Process’

August 28, 2013

Vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study

Health Freedom, Special Reports

Breakthrough Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier

October 6, 2022

Dr. Jake Scott testifying at a Senate hearing on September 9, 2025

Health Freedom, News & Analysis

How Medical ‘Experts’ Deceive the Public about Vaccine Safety

January 22, 2026

Join the Discussion

Your first comment is briefly held for approval to keep out spam and trolls; after that, your comments post instantly. Please keep discussion civil and on topic — see the comment policy.

Formatting: <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i>, <a href="URL">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

>

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This