The Fictional MSM Narrative of Obama’s ‘Reluctance’ to Intervene in Syria

by Apr 29, 2015Foreign Policy0 comments

President Barack Obama speaks at Cairo University in Cairo, Egypt, Thursday, 4 June 2009 (White House)

Reuters presents the standard fictional narrative that the Obama administration has been reluctant to intervene in Syria.

In line with the standard fictional mainstream media narrative that the troubles in Syria are a consequence of US inaction, Reuters reports the following:

Obama has been reluctant to intervene in Syria since the anti-government revolt there erupted in March 2011.

He turned down an earlier proposal in summer 2012, backed by virtually all his top security advisers, to arm moderate Syrian rebels. And after Assad crossed Obama’s “red line” and used chemical weapons, the U.S. president opted against a military response, instead negotiating a deal with Russia to remove Syrian stockpiles of advanced chemical arms.

Reuters presents the standard fictional narrative that the Obama administration has been reluctant to intervene in Syria.

Reuters presents the standard fictional narrative that the Obama administration has been reluctant to intervene in Syria.

Actually, the US lost little time lending its support to the armed rebels by funneling arms to them from Saudi Arabia and Qatar in furtherance of a policy of regime change, with most of the arms winding up in the hands of “Islamic” extremists, as no less respectable a source than the New York Times reported in the fall of 2012.

It’s true that Obama turned down a proposal to arm the rebels directly in 2012. What Reuters leaves out is that a year later, the US did begin directly arming them, as the mainstream media informed us in June 2013. Down the memory hole.

Reuters reports as fact that the Assad regime “used chemical weapons” when in fact the US’s claims that it did so fell apart under scrutiny.

Oh, and Obama didn’t opt against a military response. He was quite intent on bombing Syria until John Kerry screwed that plan up by saying off-the-cuff that Syria could prevent a US bombing by agreeing to hand over its chemical weapons to international inspectors, prompting Russian President Vladimir Putin to show global leadership by calling on Assad to comply, which he did. It was Putin who acted on his own to prevent the US from bombing Syria, not a decision by Obama to stay out of it.

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I am an independent journalist, political analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal, book author, and writing coach.

My writings empower readers with the knowledge they need to see through state propaganda intended to manufacture their consent for criminal government policies.

By recognizing when we are being lied to and why, we can fight effectively for liberty, peace, and justice, in order to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

Please join my growing community of readers!

 

Related Articles

0 Comments

Share your thoughts.

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This