Table of Contents
Introduction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY_apCTdW4E
According to the CDC, it is perfectly safe to vaccinate preterm babies by the same childhood vaccination schedule as full-term infants. "You can vaccinate premature babies according to chronological age", the CDC says, meaning that there is no reason to delay vaccination until the infant has matured more, developmentally. The CDC states that "The vaccines cannot harm them and they will develop active immunity."
"The vaccines cannot harm them...."
On its face, this is a remarkably bold lie from the CDC. After all, the CDC acknowledges that vaccination carries risks of adverse events in children born full-term, so how can it possibly be true that vaccination "cannot harm" infants born prematurely?
Perhaps what the CDC is trying to communicate is that vaccination of preterm babies carries no greater risk. But if we assume this is simply a miscommunication, it would be a shockingly irresponsible one, particularly given that the CDC's target audience for this information is medical professionals, from hospital administrators to physicians to medical students. In fact, the information just quoted comes from an online course presented by the CDC through its Training and Continuing Education Online program.
Moreover, if we assume the CDC means to say that vaccination of premature infants does not place them at any greater risk, in the above video (presented by the team that made the documentary film Vaxxed), Suzanne Humphries, MD, shares research exposing what a dangerous lie this still would be. As she demonstrates, science informs us just the opposite: that vaccinating infants born prematurely puts them at significantly greater risk of a host of known adverse reactions.
🔓Continue reading with a FREE or premium membership.
Log in below or choose your membership.
Well written and researched. Truth MUST prevail.
Humphries used to be a nephrologist.
Suzanne Humphries? OMG! A non-practicing nephrologist MD (kidney specialist) who retrograded into homeopathy (but never completed a program) and has no pertinent education, board certification or professional experience in public health, infectious disease, preventive medicine or immunology!. She has never published any meaningful research (check out PubMed) in infectious disease or vaccines and chooses to make a living writing and selling books and travelling around delivering paid lectures to true believers instead.
Valtam,
It is instructive that in lieu of addressing any point of fact or logic presented either by Suzanne Humphries or myself, you engage in purely ad hominem argumentation.
You are welcome, of course, to actually address the facts.
yes?
Thoroughly researched article – thank you Jeremy
shared far and wide.
amazing, thanks
You are spot on with your research – it is heartbreaking that parent hand over their tiny babies trusting the government has done methodical research. However the reality is that profits and greed are number one.
Michelle Rowton, Neonatal Nurse Practitioner and function medicine Specialist The nurse turned whistleblower spoke of the callous, daily operating procedure she witnessed happening in the hospital she worked at.
“I think what a lot of people don’t realize in a closed space like NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) is that they’ve decided that we need to vaccinate these babies on-time. Two months after they’re born…bam, there it goes. This baby could be four months early and still supposed to be inside their mother, weighting three or four pounds and getting the same amount of vaccines as a 200 pound man.”
Rowton then went further saying:
“I’ve sat in a room with our on-call staff of physicians and practitioners (when they say) “Oh wow, this is so embarrassing this 25 weeker never actually required a breathing tube and going on the vent after he was born, he was so strong. But we gave him his two month vaccinations and he got intubated last night ha ha, oops how embarrassing. The step-down units are calling the NICU’s and saying “hey we’re going to go ahead and give these four babies their two month shots today, make sure you have beds ready because we all know they’re going to have increased breathing difficulties, feeding and digestion difficulties, apnea, and bradycardia. This is what goes on.”
JAMA study confirms Nurse Whistleblower allegations.
“Conclusions and Relevance All ELBW infants in the NICU had an increased incidence of sepsis evaluations and increased respiratory support and intubation after routine immunization. Our findings provide no evidence to suggest that physicians should not use combination vaccines in ELBW infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether timing or spacing of immunization administrations confers risk for the developing adverse events and whether a prior history of sepsis confers risk for an altered immune response in ELBW infants.”