Yesterday, I had the honor of chatting with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. about theories on the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the “lockdown” policy responses to COVID-19, and executive mask-wearing orders.
As Kennedy says in the video (also viewable on CHD TV here), with so much misinformation coming from both sides of the argument on these issues, it can be challenging to separate the chaff from the wheat. His organization Children’s Health Defense, for which I’m a contributing writer, just yesterday also launched its new publication The Defender with that goal specifically in mind.
As his own words, The Defender is “an online news site to evade official censorship, to report fact-based news and sponsor the kind of honest debate that terrifies the new generation of corporate and government commissars. We mean The Defender to be the antidote to the corporate subversion of democracy. By keeping us uninformed, the plutocracy hopes we will remain sick, compliant, fragmented, disorganized and reliant on the chemical and pharmaceutical paradigms and government handouts. The Defender will feature information and commentary to shatter Big Tech’s dictatorial hold on discourse, conversation and debate in the public square and to break the cycle of government obedience.”
That is certainly a mission I can get on board with! It was awesome to have the opportunity talk to RFK, Jr. about some of these very issues as related to the policy responses to COVID-19. I was also honored and humbled that he described me as “one of my favorite people” and “a source of reliable information”. Introducing me to his Instagram followers, he said, “I really rely on his judgment on a lot of the issues that are very complex”. Quite the high compliments!
I hope our discussion helps bring you clarity about the important topics we addressed!
(To clarify one thing I said, I was discussing the Lancet meta-analysis used by the WHO to update its mask guidance and said that none of the studies were related to SARS-CoV-2. I meant to say that none outside of the health care setting were relevant to SARS-CoV-2. They were all related to SARS. I discuss this more detail in my article and with references in my article “How the New York Times Lies about SARS-CoV-2 Transmission: Part 3“.)
