Reading Progress:

Science vs. the Vaccine Religion, Part 3: COVID-19

by Nov 4, 2020Health Freedom, Articles, Economic Freedom, Interviews & Debates, Multimedia0 comments

Anthony Fauci wearing a mask, just before removing it to answer a question in a House Committee on June 23, 2020 (Screenshot of YouTube video posted by Bloomberg QuickTake: Now)
In this interview, I explain how COVID-19 "lockdown" policies and their mass vaccination endgame are unsupported by scientific evidence.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

In this follow-up interview with Nate the Voluntaryist, I discuss how the authoritarian “lockdown” measures implemented by governments in response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are unsupported by scientific evidence and rather based on faith that the solution lies with the pharmaceutical industry’s vaccine technology.

Topics we covered include:

  • How there is no correlation between strict “lockdown” measures and COVID-19 mortality
  • How lockdown advocates get Sweden totally wrong, and how Sweden’s policy has rather been extraordinarily successful
  • How lockdown measures utterly failed to protect those at highest risk from COVID-19 in US lockdown states
  • How even the lockdown-advocating New York Times has admitted that Sweden is better off now than the US
  • How the World Health Organization (WHO) misled the public and created mass fear and panic serving to manufacture consent for extreme lockdown measures by reporting a COVID-19 fatality rate of 3.4%
  • How even the “best estimate” of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shows that for people under 50 years of age, the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 is considerably less than the commonly reported fatality rate for influenza of 0.1%
  • How the CDC’s own data also show that 94% of people whose deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 had one or more other underlying medical conditions
  • How PCR tests have been widely misused for diagnostic purposes
  • The important distinction between deaths occurring after a positive PCR test and deaths from COVID-19
  • The important distinction between infection and disease
  • How the New York Times has acknowledged that 90% of positive PCR tests likely represent detection of non-infectious viral RNA
  • How the lockdown justification shifted from temporary short-term measures to “flatten the curve” to indefinite measures to reduce the near meaningless metric of “cases” as defined by positive PCR tests to near zero
  • How the explicitly stated endgame of lockdown measures is mass vaccination
  • Why faith-based policies resting on the assumption that vaccine technology is the solution to COVID-19 are insane
  • Why any vaccine that gets to market under “Operation Warp Speed” will be experimental
  • Why any claim that a vaccine is “safe” is completely meaningless in the absence of randomized, placebo-controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes, including mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated people
  • Why the CDC’s estimated infection fatality rates are probably also overestimated
  • Why the claim that SARS-CoV-2 has a zoonotic origin remains to be proven, and why the idea that it originated in a lab is not a “conspiracy theory” but a plausible scientific hypothesis
  • How the WHO very early on held up China’s authoritarian response to the outbreak as a model for the rest of the world to follow
  • How the role of the WHO subsequently shifted to become more moderate and objective, and how lockdown advocates have criticized the WHO for accurately representing the science, such as by stating that airborne transmission remains theoretical, that transmission from truly asymptomatic individuals appears to be very rare, and that universal mask use among the general public is unsupported by scientific evidence
  • How Dr. Anthony Fauci’s claim, during a confrontation with Senator Rand Paul, MD, that natural herd immunity is unobtainable and does not help explain the declined epidemic curve in either New York or Sweden reveals that he either lacks knowledge about the science or is totally dishonest
  • How a 1986 law shifted the financial burden for vaccine injuries away from the pharmaceutical industry and onto the taxpaying consumers
  • The incredible malevolent influence of the pharmaceutical industry in government, the media, and the medical establishment
  • The malevolent influence of government on science
  • How public policy treats vaccination as a one-size-fits-all solution to disease prevention, and why this approach is completely unscientific
  • How the same ludicrous and unscientific approach is reflected in lockdown measures including executive mask-wearing orders
  • Why politicians’ assumption that they are omniscient enough to be able to dictate whose labors are “essential” versus “non-essential” is ludicrous, and why the related “stay-at-home” orders constitute extremely dangerous authoritarianism
  • Why everyone ought to be seriously concerned about the real threat of mandatory COVID-19 vaccination
  • Why, logically, executive-mask wearing orders are not about the science and therefore not about reducing viral transmission but about the exercise of power and desire to attain the public’s obedience to authoritarian rule
  • Why there is a time and a place for mask use but also a time and a place for civil disobedience to unscientific and authoritarian lockdown measures
  • Why the central fallacy of economic central planning also underlies the lockdown measures
  • What the CDC’s response to questions from Congressman Dan Burton about the influence of the pharmaceutical industry reveals about the CDC’s conflicts of interest and refusal to be honest with the public
  • How the US government has acknowledged that vaccines can cause brain damage manifesting as symptoms of autism
  • How serious discussion about public vaccine policy is practically nonexistent in the mainstream discourse
  • Why the use of aluminum as an adjuvant in vaccines is so highly concerning
  • How none of the clinical trials used by the FDA for licensure of the HPV vaccine were designed to determine whether the vaccine is effective at reducing the risk of cervical cancer
  • Why observational studies are insufficient for safety studies and no substitute for randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes
  • The problem of selection bias such as the “healthy user” bias uncovered in one of the studies the media wrongly hailed as having shown that the MMR vaccine is not associated with the risk of being diagnosed with autism
  • How the FDA admitted under sworn testimony to Congress that the mercury-based preservative Thimerosal that was used in numerous vaccines recommended for routine use in children by the CDC and continues to be used in multi-dose vials of influenza vaccine has never been tested for safety in humans—other than a 1929 study by its developer, Eli Lily, in which every individual exposed to mercury from vaccines died
  • How the FDA acknowledged before Congress the scientific possibility that mercury-containing vaccines cause neurodevelopmental harm while insisting on the belief that they can’t—and how this is yet another stark illustration of the vaccine religion
  • How the CDC’s claim that the mercury in vaccines is non-toxic and readily eliminated from the body is contradicted by its own cited studies

Watch the full interview now.

Watch part one.

Watch part two.

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

>
Share via
Copy link