On March 5, I joined Bernadette Pajer, the Public Policy Director for Informed Choice Washington, on her show An Informed Life Radio to discuss the authoritarian lockdown responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and their mass vaccination endgame. In particular, we focused on how government “health” officials, the mainstream media, and pro-lockdown “scientists” are hypocritically spreading misinformation in furtherance of the political agenda of achieving high vaccination rates. Topics we covered include:
- How I came to do independent journalism as a matter of conscience
- How the policy goal of achieving high vaccination rates is fundamentally incompatible with the goal of educating people to be able to make their own informed choice
- How informed consent cannot happen in the presence of coercion
- How the Oregon Medical Board suspended the license of Dr. Paul Thomas because he respects parents’ right to informed consent for vaccinations, and how the suspension order came just days after he published a study in a peer-reviewed journal showing that his unvaccinated patients are by far the healthiest children in his practice
- How “misinformation” is being used as a euphemism to describe any information, no matter how factual, that isn’t conducive to the policy goal of achieving high vaccine uptake
- How one beneficial outcome of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic is a mass awakening to how the government blatantly lies to push authoritarian agendas
- How absent randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes, including all-cause mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, any claim that a vaccine is “safe and effective” is scientifically meaningless
- How science tells us not that vaccination is a one-size-fits-all solution to disease prevention but that an individual risk-benefit analysis must be done for each vaccine and each individual
- How the censorship of truth has gotten out of control, such as Facebook declaring that if you say that COVID-19 vaccines “are not approved”, your post will be removed, even though the FDA’s own fact sheets for recipients informs that they remain “unapproved” pharmaceutical products
- How there are opportunity costs to vaccination due to the superior immunity conferred by natural infection and health benefits of pathogenic challenge, and how policymakers refuse to take the opportunity costs or “non-specific effects” of vaccines into consideration
- How I’ve been fact-checking the ridiculous “fact checkers” and their hypocritical misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines
- How the government and media have blatantly and hypocritically lied to the public by claiming that up to half of community transmission from SARS-CoV-2 is “asymptomatic”
- How government officials, the media, and even lockdown-advocating scientists have blatantly and hypocritically lied to the public by claiming that the waning of antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection means that they rapidly lose their immunity
- How the government is stupidly telling people with natural immunity that they still need to get vaccinated on the basis of the same false claim that “antibodies” equal “immunity”
- How mass vaccination policy is implicitly premised on the false assumption that, absent pharmaceutical intervention, our immune systems are not capable of protecting us from disease
- How the vaccine manufacturers have a fantastic anti-free-market business model for themselves with taxpayer-funded research and development, legal immunity against vaccine injury lawsuits, and government-mandated use of their products
That was an extremely powerful interview. We should all be thankful to have you and others like you who can get and so clearly relay information to us. What a blessing! These are crazy times and while many realize there’s an agenda we wouldn’t be able challenge those in control without your help.
I’m glad you got a lot out of it. Thanks for the feedback.
Thank you for your recent work on this vaccine – and all vaccines. Until this pandemic started, I was not anti-vaccine. But then I read an article somewhere that stated that childhood deaths had dramatically decreased during this time and they related it to the lack of vaccinations. Wow! I have been following development of these covid vaccines closely and I will be reading your work on this. Thank you.
I am glad you find my work valuable. To be clear, I do not identify with the term “anti-vaccine”. What I stand in opposition to is not vaccines, per se, but government policies that violate our right to informed consent. Unfortunately, the media use the term “anti-vaxxer” as a derogatory label to describe anyone who advocates informed consent when it comes to these particular pharmaceutical products.
Jeremy, from what I understand in a different video from which you were interviewed, you believe the covid virus is real and has been isolated. However, Dr. Andrew Kaufman has made an excellent rebuttal to the various things you said in the interview. Dr. Kaufman goes point by point to debunk your explanation of how a virus is discovered.
And, in his video, the definitions and technology behind isolation, the methodology being used by scientists, and the agenda by governmental agencies are examined with the appropriate corrections.
Here is Dr. Kaufman’s excellent rebuttal: https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
I have seen it. I don’t agree that he rebutted anything I said at all. If you disagree, please present me with whatever you think was his strongest rebuttal.