Reading Progress:

Interview: Combatting the Threat of Censorship of Vaccine Information

by Mar 17, 2021Articles, Economic Freedom, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates, Multimedia0 comments

(Image by squarefrog. Licensed under Pixabay License.)
In this interview, I discuss the problem of censorship of information about vaccines and approaches to address this threat.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

I recently joined attorney Patricia Finn on her show The Good Health Lawyer to discuss the topic of vaccines. We were joined by her co-host, Bernadette Pajer of Informed Choice Washington (who also recently interviewed me for her own show), and Larry Cook, the founder of Stop Mandatory Vaccination.

Specifically, we discussed how truthful information about vaccines is being censored while official misinformation is deemed approvable by Big Tech companies like Facebook. Topics we covered include:

  • How I got started doing independent journalism on vaccines
  • How what we’re told science says about vaccines by the government and media and what science actually tells are two completely different things
  • How my reader community contributes to the quality of my journalism so that we together can develop the arguments we need to combat the existential threats to our health and liberty
  • How I intend for my articles not just to share information but to teach news consumers how to think critically so as not to become deceived by propaganda
  • How social media are censoring information in service to the government’s political agenda of achieving high vaccination rates, with “misinformation” being used as a euphemism for any information, no matter how factual, that might lead people to conclude that vaccination is not the right choice for themselves or their children
  • How informed consent advocates are placed under much greater scrutiny than the government and mainstream media, who lie with impunity while dissident voices are silenced
  • How the fact that Big Tech companies like Facebook are private companies is not an appropriate legal defense for censorship since they are serving as de facto state actors by censoring in service to the government
  • How the Federal Reserve, a government-legislated private monopoly over the currency supply that engages in legalized counterfeiting (yes, there is a logical segue to this topic from the discussion of legal approaches to combating censorship!)

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

>
Share via
Copy link