Reading Progress:

Interview: “The Science™” vs. the Science on COVID-19

by Oct 18, 2021Articles, Economic Freedom, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates, Multimedia0 comments

Anthony Fauci wearing a mask, just before removing it to answer a question in a House Committee on June 23, 2020 (Screenshot of YouTube video posted by Bloomberg QuickTake: Now)
What the “public health” establishment and the media say science says and what science actually tells us are two completely different things.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

0
(0)

I recently joined James Jenneman on his Blackbird podcast to follow up a discussion we had in March 2021 about the authoritarian policy responses to the COVID‑19 pandemic and their mass vaccination endgame. We discussed lockdowns, masks, natural versus vaccine-conferred immunity to SARS-CoV-2, and the governmental assault on the fundamental human right of every individual to make their own informed choice about whether to accept risk-carrying pharmaceutical products.

Here is James’ description of our interview on his show notes page:

Everyone’s favorite independent journalist and health freedom advocate Jeremy Hammond returns to the show to talk about new things he’s learned (how terrifying is antigenic original sin, huh?), what’s going on in the covid world, and talk about his new book, The War on Informed Consent. The book tells the story of a pediatrician in Oregon whose medical license was suspended for his heresy and apostasy surrounding vaccines, despite his rigorous evidence supporting his practice.

Specific topics we covered include:

  • How the public health establishment has proven its lack of trustworthiness once again by clearly placing the political goal of achieving a high vaccination rate over public health, as illustrated by the official ignorance of the superiority of natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2.
  • How the COVID-19 vaccines have a very narrow immunological focus, whereas natural immunity involves a much broader repertoire of immune responses against the coronavirus.
  • Why natural immunity offers superior protection against “variants of concern” including the Delta variant.
  • What “non-specific effects” of vaccines are and why it is important to have data from randomized controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes, including all-cause mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, which we do not have.
  • What “original antigenic sin” is and why it is important to understand to be able to make an informed choice about whether to get a COVID-19 vaccine.
  • Why natural immunity must be considered as an opportunity cost of vaccination.
  • How the promise that the vaccines would enable the development of herd immunity have proven false, with studies indicating that the effectiveness against infection wanes rapidly and that fully vaccinated individuals who become infected with SARS‑CoV‑2 are just as contagious as unvaccinated individuals.
  • What “antibody dependent enhancement” is and why, although I haven’t seen evidence that this is occurring to date, it remains a theoretical concern with the vaccines.
  • How the evidence supporting the conclusion that lockdowns and mask mandates had a positive effect is very weak, whereas the evidence that they did not is very strong.
  • How outright scientific fraud is not that uncommon in the peer-reviewed medical literature.
  • How what the government and media say science says and what science actually says are two completely different things.
  • How the medical and scientific establishment is thoroughly corrupted by the influence of the pharmaceutical industry and the government.
  • How Dr. Anthony Fauci as head of the NIAID is literally partnered with Moderna, developer of one of the COVID-19 vaccines.
  • Why the Pfizer vaccine should still be considered an experimental pharmaceutical product despite it now having received FDA approval as opposed to emergency use authorization.
  • How governments are waging war against our right to informed consent, as illustrated by the example of Dr. Paul Thomas, whose license was suspended by the Oregon Medical Board on demonstrably false pretexts, the true reason being that he respects parents’ right to make their own informed choice about childhood vaccinations rather than pushing the CDC’s schedule on them.
  • How Dr. Thomas’s license was suspended just days after publishing a peer-reviewed study strongly indicating that his completely unvaccinated patients were the healthiest children in his practice, and how the medical board ignored that study despite having demanded that he produce peer-reviewed evidence supporting his approach to vaccinations.
  • Why the practice of medical licensing is detrimental to public health.
  • How the Michigan Supreme Court rightly ruled that Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s executive orders implementing authoritarian lockdown measures were in violation of the Michigan Constitution.
  • How the public health establishment has been lying about natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 to push the political and financial agenda of mass vaccination.

To purchase my book The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board, click here!

Rate This Content:

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

Please Share!

Follow Me:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

>
Share via
Copy link