I recently had the honor of speaking with Dr. Paul Thomas, the renowned pediatrician and author of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan who is still being persecuted by the Oregon Medical Board for respecting parents’ right to make their own choices about childhood vaccinations.
We talked about how the “public health” establishment sold COVID-19 vaccines to the public on the basis of the lie that they would provide durable protection against infection and transmission, and how the FDA recently authorized Pfizer’s vaccine for “emergency use” in infants and toddlers on the basis of an ostensible risk-benefit analysis characterized by brazen scientific fraud.
Our discussion is now published as Episode 63 of his show Against the Wind. My interview begins at about the 26-minute mark in the embedded video above. Topics we discussed include:
- Why I shifted the focus of my research from matters of foreign policy to matters of health freedom.
- Why the FDA’s “immunobridging” analysis that served as the basis for authorizing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for “emergency use” in infants and toddlers is scientifically fraudulent.
- Note: When I said that the clinical trial showed a higher rate of “adverse events” and reinfections for children aged two to four years, I meant to say a higher rate of severe COVID-19 and reinfections!
- How the FDA exaggerated the risks to children from COVID-19, such as deceiving about the risk of COVID-19-related myocarditis and “Long COVID”.
- How the FDA vaccine approval process is biased in favor of the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry, and how the government has granted legal immunity to vaccine manufacturers against vaccine injury lawsuits.
- How the CDC has blatantly and ridiculously lied that COVID-19 vaccines offer better protection than natural immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- How cellular immunity appears to play an even more important role than antibodies in protecting against severe COVID-19.
- How the FDA completely ignored studies confirming that an immunological phenomenon known as “original antigenic sin” is a real problem with COVID-19 vaccines.
- Why natural immunity must be considered an opportunity cost of vaccination, and how policymakers perpetually fail to take this into consideration.
- How even hard-core public vaccine policy advocates like Dr. Paul Offit have distanced themselves from FDA decision-making because its actions haven so transparently political as opposed to being based on the science.
- How the government and media have waged a disinformation campaign against ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19.
- How an article of mine correcting mainstream media disinformation about ivermectin was cited by LinkedIn as a reason for suspending my account on the false pretext that by doing so I had violated their prohibition of misinformation.
- How Deborah Birx admitted in testimony before Congress that the claim made by the “public health” establishment that two doses of COVID-19 vaccine would induce durable sterilizing immunity that would prevent infection and transmission was based on “hope” and not scientific evidence.
- How the vaccine religion is a subsect of the state religion, and how the influence of the state religion results in a mainstream media establishment that largely refuses to do real journalism.
To learn more about Dr. Thomas’s story and how ethical physicians like him are being persecuted for not unethically pressuring parents to strictly comply with the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule, read my book The War on Informed Consent:
