“Scanners pose ‘negligible’ risk. Trust us, we’re the TSA!”

by Jun 12, 2012Health & Vaccines0 comments

The Los Angeles Times headline reads “TSA scanners pose negligible risk to passengers, new test shows”. The reason that headline is dishonest is because it uses the verb “shows” rather than “claims”.

The Los Angeles Times headline reads “TSA scanners pose negligible risk to passengers, new test shows”. The reason that headline is dishonest is because it uses the verb “shows” rather than “claims”.

The article begins:

Full-body scanners used for security screening at the nation’s airports do not expose passengers to dangerous levels of radiation, according to a new independent analysis of the security devices.

The study by the Marquette University College of Engineering concluded that radiation from so-called backscatter scanners passes beyond a passenger’s skin to reach 29 different organs — including the heart and brain. But the radiation levels are considerably lower than those of other X-ray procedures such as mammograms, the study said.

This is “the first independent review of the scanners”, the Times notes. Halfway through we read (emphasis added):

The author of the Marquette study, assistant professor of biomedical engineering Taly Gilat Schmidt, did not test the actual machines. Instead, she based her conclusions on scanner radiation data released publicly by the TSA. She ran the numbers through simulation software that modeled how X-ray photons travel through a body.

So using the TSA’s own data rather than actually independently testing the machines, the author found that “the results of her test suggest the risk to passengers is negligible” (emphasis added). Well, yes, perhaps it does “suggest” that, but it doesn’t by any means “show” it.

The Times closes with:

But Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, questioned the Marquette study because it was based on data provided by the TSA.

“We do not truly know the risk of this radiation exposure over multiple screenings, for frequent fliers, those in vulnerable groups, or TSA’s own employees operating the machines,” she said in a statement.

 How many people will read only the headline, or just the the lede?

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I am an independent journalist, political analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal, book author, and writing coach.

My writings empower readers with the knowledge they need to see through state propaganda intended to manufacture their consent for criminal government policies.

By recognizing when we are being lied to and why, we can fight effectively for liberty, peace, and justice, in order to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

Please join my growing community of readers!

 

Download my free report 5 Horrifying Facts about the FDA Vaccine Approval Process.

Download my free report 5 Horrifying Facts about the FDA Vaccine Approval Process.

My Books

Related Articles

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This