...

How Can ‘Austerity’ Be Blamed for the EU’s Woes If It Hasn’t Been Tried?

The New York Times in an editorial inadvertently lets slip one fallacy of blaming the supposed spending cuts of “austerity” measures for Europe’s economic woes

by Jeremy R. Hammond

Jun 14, 2013

… read
READING PROGRESS: 0%

The New York Times in an editorial inadvertently lets slip one fallacy of blaming the supposed spending cuts of “austerity” measures for Europe’s economic woes, reporting that the IMF

says it underestimated the damage that government spending cuts and tax increases would do to the Greek economy.

See, “austerity” as it has come to be used includes government attempts to increase its own revenues by placing even more of a burden on the private sector via increased taxes. And what about those supposed spending cuts?

Martin Masse at Mises.org asks, “Is ‘Austerity’ Responsible for the Crisis in Europe?” and provides the answer. Here’s a chart he provides of government revenue and expenditures for the E.U.

eu-spending

And here’s the expenditures broken down by country:

eu-spending-2

Where are all the massive spending cuts we’ve been hearing so much about? How can the E.U.’s woes be blamed on spending cuts when in fact government expenditures have continued to grow? Masse comments:

If we define austerity as the measures taken to reduce budget deficits, then in that sense austerity is indeed responsible for the crisis. If, however, we define it more properly as policies bringing about a reduction in the size of government, then these policies cannot be held responsible for the crisis in Europe because they were never applied….

Keynesians will, of course, regret that there haven’t been even larger spending increases, greater borrowing and expanded deficits in the past few years to stimulate the economy. But, from an Austrian perspective, bloated governments, and higher taxes certainly help explain why European economies are still in the doldrums, several years after the financial crisis.

What Europe needs is smaller governments, not just in terms of public spending but also as regards deregulation of the job market and other structural reforms to encourage entrepreneurship, private investment, and job creation. There will be sustained growth in Europe only when governments, and not citizens or businesses, finally bear the brunt of austerity.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I’m an independent journalist exposing the state propaganda that manufactures public consent for criminal government policies.

My work examines US foreign policy, market interventionism, and so-called "public health" policy through one consistent lens: an uncompromising application of the non-aggression principle that transcends the narrow linear spectrum of "left" vs. "right".

Read about my mission and core values →

Essential Reading

The Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building in Washington, D.C., 1937 (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System/Public Domain)

Liberty & Society, News & Analysis

Yes, Virginia, Banks Really Do Create Money Out of Thin Air

August 4, 2012

Blog, Health Freedom

How the New York Times Lies about HepB Vaccine Safety

August 15, 2025

The New York Times building in New York City (Torrenegra/CC BY 2.0)

Health Freedom, Special Reports

Should You Get the Flu Shot Every Year? Don’t Ask the New York Times.

February 7, 2018

Join the Discussion

Your first comment is briefly held for approval to keep out spam and trolls; after that, your comments post instantly. Please keep discussion civil and on topic — see the comment policy.

Formatting: <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i>, <a href="URL">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

  • karen st john says:

    Due to an increase in population, even if no changes are made in fiscal policy, spending usually goes up . If it stays the same, it might be considered austerity.

  • >

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This