Nicholas D. Kristof’s Insanity on Syria

by Sep 8, 2013Foreign Policy0 comments

Kristof asks, "for those of you who oppose cruise missile strikes, what alternative do you favor?" Um...

In a previous column, Nicholas D. Kristof argued that the U.S. should bomb Syria even though there were “legitimate concerns” that this could kill civilians, cause an escalation of violence on the ground, further destabilize the region, and empower extremist groups like the al-Qaeda affiliated al-Nusra Front.

In his next column, he again acknowledged the “all risks and uncertainties”, as well as that American public opinion is against the bombing, but nevertheless asks, “But for those of you who oppose cruise missile strikes, what alternative do you favor?”

Um… How about just not engaging in actions that risk killing civilians, escalating the violence, detabilizing the region, and empowering terrorist organizations? That might be a good start.

Kristof writes that “So far, we’ve tried peaceful acquiescence, and it hasn’t worked very well. The longer the war drags on in Syria, the more Al Qaeda elements gain strength, the more Lebanon and Jordan are destabilized, and the more people die.”

Actually, though, as I pointed out in response to that previous column of his, the U.S. has not “tried peaceful acquiescence”. What actually “hasn’t worked very well” is the U.S.’s policy of intervening in the conflict, arming and training the rebels whose ranks include these very same “Al Qaeda elements”, with most of the CIA-funneled arms ending up in the hands of the extremists.

Kristof’s argument is thus essentially that the U.S. must continue doing what it has been doing only on an even greater scale, despite the acknowledged risk that this might even further strengthen the terrorists, further destabilize the region, and further escalate the killing.

In other words, Kristof meets Einstein’s definition of what it means to be “insane”.

Albert Einstein: Insanity

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I am an independent journalist, political analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal, book author, and writing coach.

My writings empower readers with the knowledge they need to see through state propaganda intended to manufacture their consent for criminal government policies.

By recognizing when we are being lied to and why, we can fight effectively for liberty, peace, and justice, in order to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

Please join my growing community of readers!


My Books

Related Articles


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This