Iran: Official Khamenei Website Censors My Interview on the Qatar Crisis

by Jun 19, 2017Foreign Policy10 comments

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Hosseini (seysd shahaboddin vajedi/CC BY 4.0)

The official website of Iran's Supreme Leader interviewed me about US policy, Saudi Arabia, and the Qatar crisis, but censored my mild criticism of Iran.

The official website of Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, khamenei.ir, recently interviewed me to discuss US policy toward Iran, as well as Saudi Arabia and the Qatar crisis. The editors, however, chose to censor a portion of my interview that was just slightly critical of the Iranian government — even while falsely claiming that what was published is the “full text of the interview”.

In light of this censorship, here is the full text, with the censored portion restored (red text):

What does history teach us in dealing with US?

By “us”, I assume you mean Iranians, in which case there are obvious lessons in the US’s role in overthrowing Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953, installation and sustainment of the Shah regime, support for Iraq’s war on Iran in the 1980s, the US shootdown of a civilian Iranian airliner in 1988, its efforts to isolate Iran for its nuclear program despite it being under IAEA safeguards and despite the US’s own intelligence having assessed that Iran has no nuclear weapons program, and its efforts to collectively punish the civilian population of Iran (i.e., “sanctions” targeting Iran’s economy).

The general lesson form the history of US policy toward Iran is that the US regards Iran as a rogue state because it refuses to follow marching orders from Washington, D.C. US policy centers around sustaining pretexts for punishing both the government and the people of Iran for disobedience.

Does challenging US has a lower price than appeasing it? What does the Saudi arms deal with US prove?

The answer to the first question depends on how much one values Iran remaining independent of Washington, as well as what it means to “challenge” or “appease” the US. If challenging the US means refusing to follow orders from Washington because it would not be in the best interests of the Iranian people, then I think the cost of appeasing the US is far higher. But that’s ultimately a subjective valuation the people of Iran themselves need to make. There is a legitimate concern in the West that the form of government which exists in Iran today does not lend the Iranian people the voice they deserve.

Washington, however, pretenses to the contrary aside, is not interested in establishing “democracy” in Iran. Democracy is fine, in the view of US policymakers, so long as elections go the right way.

Why does US broadens ties with Saudi dictatorship but ignores huge turnout in Iran’s election?

My rough assessment on that is that the Trump administration places great value on sustaining US dollar hegemony. The Saudis have long played a role in that with its trading of oil in US dollars and its recycling of those petrodollars back into the US economy, such as through arms purchases. This concern about sustaining US dollar hegemony trumps all else (no pun intended).

As for Iran’s election, I don’t think it is a matter of the US not paying attention. Rather, the expected result occurred and since the status quo is thus sustained, it doesn’t pop up on Washington’s radar as a priority issue to focus on.

What is the reason for desperate moves of Saudi regime in escalating tensions in Syria, Yemen, and Bahrain?

The Saudi regime seems paranoid that Iran’s influence poses a threat to its existence and is lashing out wherever it perceives policies or circumstances to be aligned the wrong way. We can of course now add Qatar to this list, even though Qatar has been Saudi Arabia’s (and the CIA’s) partner in arming extremist groups in Syria.

Saudi Arabia is essentially engaging in the very kinds of behaviors the US accuses Iran of doing or aspiring to do, only instead of censuring the Saudi regime for its war crimes, support for terrorism, and human rights abuses at home, the US provides the regime with the means to commit those crimes.

Its actions illustrate how isolated and vulnerable the Saudi regime is fundamentally, but it does have a powerful benefactor.

Did you find value in this content? If so and you have the means, please consider supporting my independent journalism.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I am an independent journalist, political analyst, publisher and editor of Foreign Policy Journal, book author, and writing coach.

My writings empower readers with the knowledge they need to see through state propaganda intended to manufacture their consent for criminal government policies.

By recognizing when we are being lied to and why, we can fight effectively for liberty, peace, and justice, in order to create a better world for ourselves, our children, and future generations of humanity.

Please join my growing community of readers!

 

My Books

Related Articles

10 Comments

  1. Javed Mir

    Quite a few relevant questions – BUT one fundamental problem ie Sunny-Shia divide so strongly propagated by the Iranian leaders, has been omitted in this conversation.

    Reply
    • Paranam Kid

      Sunny-Shia divide is also strongly (If not more strongly) propagated by the Saudi regime.

      Reply
      • Javed Mir

        BUT this is a problem and should be resolved. It does not matter much who propagated it.

      • Paranam Kid

        You clearly stated that the divide is propagated by the Iranian leaders, as if the Saudis are not propagating anything, which is certainly not the case. So, the way you have phrased it, maybe unintentionally, you apportion all the blame to the Iranians. That way it is not possible to get to a solution.

        So, yes it does matter who propagates what because only by recognising & defining who does what will they be able to get to the root cause.

      • Javed Mir

        Thank you that you agreed to some extent to what I have said.

      • Paranam Kid

        Right, but I have a sneaking feeling you don’t agree even to some extent with what I have said otherwise you would have acknowledged it. And, if this premise is true, then that is a good example as to why the divide is not closed.

      • Javed Mir

        Yes.

      • Paranam Kid

        Yes what? Yes I am right or yes the Saudis also propagate the divide?

      • Javed Mir

        Yes means division is there and needs to be bridged.

      • Paranam Kid

        You are avoiding the point I make, and you don’t answer my question.

        There is no need for me to go through the back and forth of comments between us. Suffice to say that as long as there is no effort of MUTUAL understanding between Sunnis & Shias, nor any willingness to compromise from BOTH sides, the divide will not be closed.

        Like all the main stream media outlets, you can keep blaming Iran for the divide, but the FACT is that Saudi Arabia is a “co-defendant”.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares
Share This