...

Reading Progress:

Facebook “Fact-Checker” Misinforms Users about Vaccine Safety

Jun 17, 2019

A Facebook “Fact-Checker” feature purports to identify misinformation about vaccines while itself blatantly lying to the public about vaccine safety.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

Introduction

Facebook has unveiled a new “Fact-Checker” feature­ that’s now being used to supposedly combat misinformation about vaccines, but which is actually being used to propagandize. A “Fact-Checker” showing up on a popular video by Del Bigtree, host of the show The HighWire, claims that the video is presenting false information. However, Facebook itself in this case is guilty of misinforming its users about vaccine safety.

Those in the mainstream discourse calling for efforts to combat misinformation about vaccines actually have no problem at all with misinformation. Transparently, what they instead have a problem with is any information that might lead parents to conclude that strictly complying with the routine childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might not be in the best interests of their child. They have no problem with lies about vaccine safety and effectiveness as long as it’s intended to persuade parents to vaccinate their children.

This is evident in the case of the aforementioned Facebook “Fact-Checker”. In the HighWire video, published on May 4, 2017, Bigtree states that ingredients used in vaccines include aluminum and mercury, which are both known neurotoxins, and that vaccines can cause encephalopathy, which is a term encompassing any type of brain damage, disorder, or disease. This includes encephalitis, which refers to inflammation of the brain. On the screen, he shows the product package insert for Merck’s measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine, which lists encephalitis and encephalopathy among the possible adverse consequences of getting an MMR shot.

Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” that now appears with the video states that this is “False”, adding that “Current data shows that vaccines are safe and do not cause toxicity or encephalopathy”. This links to an article on the website of the organization Health Feedback titled “Contrary to popular video claim, vaccine ingredients are safe, not linked to encephalopathy”.

Facebook fact-checker on vaccines
A screenshot of Facebook's "Fact-Checker" on a HighWire video

The Health Feedback article presents a fabricated quote, attributing to Bigtree the words “Toxic vaccine ingredients in the MMR vaccine cause encephalopathy”. While Bigtree does suggest this, those words do not appear in the video and so should be presented as a paraphrase, not as a direct quote. The whole context of Bigtree’s video is omitted, which is that it was a response to a video by Bill Nye (“The Science Guy”) in which Nye misleadingly implies that the viral or bacterial antigens are the only components of vaccines. Bigtree was educating his viewers that, to the contrary, vaccines also contain numerous other ingredients, including, depending on the vaccine, known neurotoxins aluminum and mercury.

Neither Facebook nor Health Feedback express any objection to Bill Nye misleading his viewers into the false belief that vaccines contain a viral or bacterial antigen component and nothing else.

Continuing in his video, Bigtree asks what happens if you inject aluminum into a baby. “Has there ever been a safety test on it?” he rhetorically inquires, then answers the question: “Never.”

He points out that mercury is the most toxic non-radioactive substance known to man and is included in flu shots being given to pregnant women. (Multi-dose vials of inactivated influenza vaccines contain the mercury-based preservative thimerosal.) Other ingredients Bigtree claims are in vaccines are formaldehyde and anti-freeze (propylene-glycol). Then he states that aluminum and mercury from vaccines end up in the brain. After rhetorically asking what happens when these neurotoxic substances reach the brain, Bigtree suggests that one consequence can be encephalopathy. It is at this point that he shows encephalopathy listed as a possible adverse event on the MMR vaccine package insert.

Here, Bigtree does mislead his viewers by implying that the MMR vaccine contains either aluminum or mercury, or both. In fact, it contains neither. Moreover, while formaldehyde is used in vaccines, propylene-glycol is not; although another chemical used to make anti-freeze, polyethylene glycol, has been. Had Facebook’s “Fact-Checker” taken an objective approach, they would have pointed out that Bigtree was right to criticize Nye for misleading his viewers, but wrong to suggest that either of these ingredients are in the MMR vaccine and wrong to say that anti-freeze is an ingredient in vaccines. Instead, they hypocritically singled out Bigtree for criticism.

Furthermore, Health Feedback itself hypocritically misinforms its readers, stating falsely that “No scientific evidence supports a causal association between vaccines or its ingredients (thimerosal, aluminum adjuvants, propylene glycol) and encephalopathy.”

“The claim that the MMR vaccine causes encephalopathy”, the Health Feedback article continues, “is based on a misinterpretation of the vaccine package insert information.”

The article acknowledges that multi-dose vials of the flu shot do contain thimerosal, which is about half ethylmercury by weight. But it claims that ethylmercury is “eliminated by the body quickly, unlike methylmercury, meaning that it does not accumulate in the body.”

Likewise, the article acknowledges that vaccines can contain aluminum salts, which are used as an adjuvant, meaning a substance included in a vaccine to elicit a stronger immune response. But, the article adds, “the levels in vaccines are low and safe”.

Also acknowledged is the fact that encephalopathy appears on the MMR package insert under the heading “Adverse Reactions”. The article argues, however, that the insert explicitly lists these “without regard to causality”, and that it is “therefore erroneous to assert a causal relationship between vaccines and encephalopathy on the basis of the package insert information.”

Health Feedback further argues: “The claim that vaccine safety is completely unknown is false. The Institute of Medicine—part of the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine—reviewed childhood immunization schedules and found them to be safe.”

The truth is, however, that on every single one of these points, it is Facebook and its “Fact-Checker” partner who are misinforming the public.

🔓Continue reading with a FREE or premium membership.

Log in below or choose your membership.

Now you know. Others don’t. Share the knowledge.

About the Author

About the Author

I am an independent researcher, journalist, and author dedicated to exposing mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.

I write about critically important issues including US foreign policy, economic policy, and so-called "public health" policies.

My books include Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent.

To learn more about my mission and core values, visit my About page.

Share Your Thoughts

(You can format comments using simple HTML — <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and <blockquote>quoted text</blockquote>)

  • codetalker says:

    Fact Check is not about facts. It’s about propaganda.
    “Contrary to popular video claim, vaccine ingredients are safe, not linked to encephalopathy”

    If you go through the list of adjudicated settlements for vaccine injuries you will see that families have been compensated for various form of encephalopathy by HHS or actually the American Taxpayer via the Vaccine Court. I sent links to pages of settlements for vaccine injuries to the Editor. If vaccines do not cause encephalopathy, encephalitis etc, than why have families been financially compensated for those injuries? I bet this won’t be added to the page on Bigtree. They get away with their propaganda and misinformation because they purposely do not have comment sections.

  • MARLENA MARKELL says:

    Actually enephalopathy used to be list on the vaccine insert as a possible side before they decided to white-wash the insert to fool the people who dont understand this stuff. Yes, its a side effect.

    • WordsMatter says:

      With respect, I’d like to offer an edit: “Yes, it’s an effect.” There are no “side effects.” Everything in that needle has an effect. Period.

    • Amber Barber says:

      This was the longest solo game of, “I know you are, but what am I?” I’ve ever had the misfortune of stumbling across.
      Thankfully, I won’t see it scroll past on Facebook without fact checkers ripping it to shreds.

      • This was the longest solo game of, “I know you are, but what am I?” I’ve ever had the misfortune of stumbling across.
        Thankfully, I won’t see it scroll past on Facebook without fact checkers ripping it to shreds.

        Amber, are you trying to suggest that my article is factually incorrect and that the Facebook “fact-checker” article is correct? If so, I suggest you first read my article before trying to criticize it.

  • codetalker says:

    If people remember, on the Tripedia manufactures vial insert Sanofi Pastueur listed ENCEPHALOPATHY, SIDS, AUTISM & ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION on the insert. https://getcancercure.com/fda-announce-that-dtap-vaccine-causes-autism/.

    I don’t know if Tripedia is still in use but years ago when people began to comment online the adverse reactions noted – the FDA removed Tripedia from it’s Biologics Blood Vaccines publication. In that same time frame hospital sites such as John Hopkins and others also removed the insert from their website. No explanation.

  • Victoria Moore DC, MA says:

    What an unbelievably sleazy scam to masquerade their propaganda under a “fact-checker,” certified by the “International Fact-Checking Network,” sponsored by the pro-vaccine Bill Gates Foundation. The layers of deceit would be difficult to unravel for an innocent truth-seeker. Thank you so much for the “insider’s look” behind the veils of obfuscation. I feel bad for sincere fact-seekers who are looking for valid information, who will be duped into believing the brainwash. Disgusting. Thank you, Jeremy R. Hammond.

  • Health Feedback uses people who helped bring us the current vaccine injury epidemic.
    https://healthfeedback.org/

    Like Dr. Neal Halsey:
    “From the beginning, I saw thimerosal as something different,” he says. ”It was the first strong evidence of a causal association with neurological impairment. I was very concerned.”
    My honest belief is that if the labels had had the mercury content in micrograms, this would have been uncovered years ago. But the fact is, no one did the calculation.”
    ”My first concern was that it would harm the credibility of the immunization program,” he says. ”But gradually it came home to me that maybe there was some real risk to the children.’
    https://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/10/magazine/the-not-so-crackpot-autism-theory.html

  • Frank Selig says:

    These media sights must be getting paid loads of money by the vaccine companies, and these vaccine companies and the FDA don’t like freedom of information at all.

  • Rtp says:

    Amazing how they think they can get away with claiming that aluminum in vaccines is harmless when its entire purpose is to elicit a permanent physiological reaction. If Al had no long term effects on the body then why have it in the vaccines at all?

    Also, it’s funny how a kid getting an injury straight after a shot is considered coincidence but a kid getting an injury straight after a measles rash is automatically considered proof that measles must have caused that injury.

    I will say this though, battling out on facts is largely ineffective. The paradigm is completely incoherent so you can always take pro-vaxer “facts” and turn them against them.

    • Also, it’s funny how a kid getting an injury straight after a shot is considered coincidence but a kid getting an injury straight after a measles rash is automatically considered proof that measles must have caused that injury.

      Good point.

  • Debbie Allsup says:

    None of the CDC vaccination schedules have been tested for safety or effectiveness. Further, none of the schedules have been tested for safety and effectiveness against a placebo-saline solution control group. Therefore, that side is spreading misinformation if they tell you that their CDC schedules are safe and effective.

  • JohnQPublic says:

    In a speech by then President John F. Kennedy in 1962, he said: “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”. This is extremely appropriate at this time, and all times.

    In addition, Representative Adam Schiff of the 28th district of California should resign from Congress because he violated his oath of office to uphold the Constitution of the United States. From his official position and stationary he encouraged corporations to commit violations of the First Amendment and engage in censorship. Unfortunately, I am sure he will not resign so it is up to the people in his district to force him out via a recall vote or vote him out at the next election.

  • MAVMP says:

    Excellent article.

  • Sean says:

    Just a question – I dont really have any in-depth knowledge on these matters..and so wondering in laymans terms…is there such a thing at all anywhere – as a safe vaccine – where there are no diabolical toxins present? (as outlined above) – or if not in existence currently – in the way that they are produced – can this be a hypothetical prospect at all. – That a vaccine could actually be working well for what it is supposed to do and not present or pose such malignant risk of damage being caused to body systems? Can there be yes to that question – even in hypothetical sense?? – or is it the way vaccines are currently done in these times – will there always be that kind of major risk going on??

    • It is not meaningful to say that any vaccine is “safe”, period. Every vaccines has the potential to cause harm. This is why a risk-benefit analysis must be done for every individual, as opposed to vaccination being used as a one-size-fits-all approach to disease prevention.

  • Karen Carson says:

    Isn’t it true that the triple vial dose of MMR vaccine does contain thermerasol, (Mercury) ? I know it has in the past, and I’m not sure that it ever was changed when the single dose vaccines supposedly took the mercury out. You claimed that Del BigTree was wrong in claiming the MMR vaccine contained Mercury.

  • >
    18.7K Shares
    18.7K Shares
    Share via
    Copy link