Reading Progress:

Interview: Confronting the Dogmas of the COVID-19 and Vaccine Religions

by Mar 10, 2021Economic Freedom, Articles, Multimedia, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates5 comments

Anthony Fauci wearing a mask, just before removing it to answer a question in a House Committee on June 23, 2020 (Screenshot of YouTube video posted by Bloomberg QuickTake: Now)
In this interview, I discuss how the policy responses to COVID-19 and their mass vaccination endgame are grounded not in science but dogma.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

I joined Nate the Voluntaryist again on his podcast to discuss the existential threat to our health and liberty posed by the governmental policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and how the lockdowns and their mass vaccination endgame are grounded not in science but dogma. Topics we cover include:

  • Similarities between government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and responses to the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic
  • How Anthony Fauci has written a paper explaining that most flu-related deaths during the 1918 pandemic were caused by bacterial meningitis
  • How a phenomenon has been observed of virus competition or strain replacement, which occurred with the H1N1 strain that caused the 1918 pandemic, resulting in its disappearance until 1979, when it reemerged missing decades of evolutionary mutations, leading scientists to conclude that it must have escaped from a lab
  • How we still do not know the origin of SARS-CoV-2, and how the idea that it originated in the lab in Wuhan is not a “conspiracy theory” but a legitimate scientific hypothesis for which there is considerable supporting evidence
  • How, unlike SARS, when the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak occurred, it did not under go rapid adaptation but was already well adapted for the human host
  • Why the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) so-called “investigation” into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is a total farce
  • How when policymakers started implementing mask mandates for members of the public in the community setting they were going against decades of scientific research suggesting that this would not be effective for preventing transmission
  • How to this day the WHO does not advocate mask mandates because the evidence does not support this; the WHO rather sensibly recommends use of masks in circumstances where prolonged close contact is unavoidable
  • How the highest quality evidence from randomized controlled trials do not find that masks are effective for preventing viral transmission
  • How you can compare the case data from all the states in the US and see the same epidemic wave regardless of lockdown measures or mask mandates, with an evident absence of association between stricter measures and fewer cases or lower mortality rates
  • How the justification for authoritarian lockdown measures has shifted over time, and how the shifted justification of reducing “cases” is a logical contradiction with the original justification of temporary measures to “flatten the curve”
  • How sensible measures to reduce transmission would not have required shutting down the economy and would have been more effective at protecting those at highest risk
  • How the enormous harms from lockdowns easily outweigh their at best questionable benefits, and how lockdown advocates have refused to take the costs of lockdowns into consideration
  • How deaths are being counted as “COVID-19 deaths” on the basis that the death occurred after the person had received a positive PCR test—regardless of the cause of death
  • Why a positive PCR test does not necessarily mean the individual has COVID-19 or an active infection with SARS-CoV-2
  • How two completely different standards of evidence for causality are applied to deaths following positive PCR tests and deaths following vaccination
  • How we might never know the true impact of the pandemic because CDC policies have made the data uninterpretable
  • How influenza has disappeared, and how the best explanation for this is the phenomenon of virus competition
  • How studies have found the DTP vaccine to be associated with an increased rate of childhood mortality and why this would be
  • How infections during childhood are associated with beneficial health outcomes such as measles being associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer
  • My response to a clip in which a nurse on TikTok irrationally criticizes speaking about the risk from SARS-CoV-2 in terms of the survival rate rather than the fatality rate
  • How in 1976 they rapidly rolled out a vaccine for a novel strain of “swine flu” influenza H1N1, with public health officials persuading the masses to accept the vaccine by warning of a deadly pandemic; and how the pandemic never happened, and the vaccine was found to cause the paralytic autoimmune disease Guillain Barre Syndrome, thus causing serious harm with no benefit
  • How the 2009 pandemic H1N1 flu shot used in Europe was found to cause narcolepsy
  • How studies have found an increased risk of miscarriage for pregnant women in the US who receive flu shots containing the pandemic strain of H1N1
  • How the Michigan state government is lying to the public that the COVID-19 vaccines have been approved using the same process used to approve every other licensed vaccine despite the FDA itself emphasizing that there are no FDA-approved vaccines for COVID-19
  • How it is scientifically meaningless to claim that a vaccine is “safe and effective” absent randomized placebo-controlled trials comparing long-term health outcomes, including all cause mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals
  • How public health officials refuse to consider the opportunity costs of vaccination resulting from the superior immunity conferred by infection and the phenomenon of “original antigenic sin”
  • Why equating a high level of antibodies with “immunity” to SARS-CoV-2 is scientifically invalid
  • How honest scientists who speak out against the lies and the harmful policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic are being censored
  • How trying to prevent people at low risk from COVID-19 from acquiring natural immunity through mass vaccination could result in prolonging and worsening the outcomes of the pandemic
  • How health care providers are, like government officials, lying to the public about the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines but the mainstream media “fact checkers” never fact check misinformation that serves the political agenda of achieving high vaccine uptake
  • My response to a video clip featuring Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Pfizer executive, sensibly explaining how most people do not need a COVID-19 vaccine and how irrational and violative it is of human rights for public health officials to be saying that for life to get back to normal, everyone must be vaccinated
  • How the goal to also mass vaccinate children, who are at extraordinarily low risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection, illustrates the institutional myopia of the public health establishment
  • How the whole paradigm of mass vaccination as a means to maintain good health is scientifically archaic, and in the future humankind will look back at our current age and consider this medical practice to be barbaric
  • How vaccine mandates as well as the idea of “immunity passports” violate fundamental human rights
  • How the policy goal of achieving high vaccine uptake is fundamentally incompatible with the goal of educating the public to be able to make an informed choice
  • Why I think one beneficial outcome of the pandemic will be a mass awakening from the mass delusion that public health officials are worthy of our trust
  • How the CDC has utterly failed in its ostensible goal of achieving good health among the US population
  • How Dr. Paul Thomas had his license suspended by the Oregon Medical Board because he respects parents right to informed consent, and how this suspension came days after Dr. Thomas published a study in a peer-reviewed journal showing that the totally unvaccinated children in his practice have significantly lower rates of diagnosed chronic health problems
  • Why we must threat the existential threat to our health and our liberty posed by public health policies and the need for civil disobedience
  • How the World Economic Forum claimed on Twitter that lockdown measures have “improved” cities around the world and then deleted the post after their post was inundated with replies ridiculing the WEF for insulting everyone with such ludicrous nonsense
  • How the authoritarian lockdown measures and their mass vaccination endgame are faith-based regimes driven not by science but dogma, and why we must resist the cult for the sake of the future of humanity
  • How the mainstream media serve the function of manufacturing consent for harmful government policies
  • Why I have hope that someday humankind will become civilized, and what it will take to get there
  • How the government of Israel is already rolling out a segregation regime inhibiting its citizens from exercising freedom unless they get vaccinated
  • My reaction to a video clip in which Bill Gates describes his ideas about how scarce resources ought to be directed to prevent the next global pandemic from wreaking havoc on humanity
  • How the CDC’s claims that the mercury in some flu shots and the aluminum in many childhood vaccines are “safe” are contradicted by its own cited sources from the medical literature
  • How the new mRNA vaccine technology alleviates concerns about injecting known neurotoxins into people but raises whole new concerns about long-term effects, such as risks related to the phenomena of “pathogenic priming” and “antibody dependent enhancement” and the possibility of mass vaccination putting evolutionary pressure on SARS-CoV-2 resulting in the emergence of “escape mutants”
  • How the whole approach of Bill Gates and his ilk is a fundamentally wrong paradigm that fails to address the fundamental reasons why so many people in developed countries are so vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2
  • My own personal struggle dealing with doctors who were less than helpful, and how I had to learn to stop listening to them and trust my own judgment to get on a path to healing
  • How Facebook’s policy is literally and demonstrably to censor truth while enabling propagation of falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

  • Rose says:

    There were experiments going on with anti-meningitis vaccines back then, they were done at Camp Funston by a certain Dr. Gates of the Rockefeller Institute, this sounds so much like a ridiculous conspiracy, if I didn’t have proof I would just STFU.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf

  • Anna says:

    Since the supposed virus was never even isolated, why are we talking about it as if its existence is a verified fact? Also, why, if the cause of the disease is indeed a virus, does every anti-parasitic substance that has been tried work so well at curing patients extremely rapidly? I find it hard to listen to a narrative-version if events that leaves out these and related points.

  • Byron Merriam says:

    The subject of covid virus isolation is disscussed by Sam Bailey here at 3:20 of this short video. https://youtu.be/tQoC39n4QP8

  • >
    Share via
    Copy link