Interview: The Medical Establishment and Vaccine Dogma

I was recently interviewed by Janean Strong for her podcast Keepin it Real with Janean about the topic of vaccines and the problems with the government and medical establishment’s one-size-fits-all approach to disease prevention. Topics we discussed include:

• How I got into doing independent journalism on the subject of vaccines
• Disease is not caused by lack of vaccinations! Why the implicit assumption underlying the paradigm of mass vaccination as a one-size-fits-all solution to infectious disease is false, and why we urgently need a paradigm shift
• How a criterion that must be met for vaccines to be authorized for emergency use by the FDA is the absence of any other approved effective treatment, and how this institutional bias in favor of mass vaccination as the answer might explain why alternative approaches have been downplayed or dismissed
• How the FDA and CDC favor patentable pharmaceutical products over natural substances that are required for functional immunity, such as vitamin D
• How the government doesn’t oversee the vaccine industry so much as it is the vaccine industry
• How vaccine manufacturers do not operate in a free market and why this needs to change
• Why the government granted vaccine manufacturers broad legal immunity against vaccine injury lawsuits and the perhaps unintended but easily predictable consequence
• How the entire medical establishment is corrupt to its core and “public health” has become a euphemism for “whatever is in the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry”
• How serious and honest discussion about vaccines does not exist in the mainstream discourse
• How the message from the censoring, thought-controlling media is that we must not consider other perspectives because we are too stupid to be able to determine the truth for ourselves and so must rely on them to do our thinking for us
• How 90% of the decline in infectious disease mortality witnessed during the 20th century occurred before there were vaccines that could possibly help to explain it
• How the focus on diverting resources to vaccine development and implementing an indiscriminate one-size-fits-all mass vaccination approach comes at an opportunity cost of researching the reasons why certain individuals are at greater risk of serious disease while others’ immune systems eliminate the infection just fine in order to develop targeted interventions
• How natural immunity differs from vaccine-conferred immunity so that vaccination comes at the cost of the lost opportunity to develop the superior immunity conferred by infection
• How the phenomenon of “original antigenic sin” must also be taken into consideration, such as how this relates to the opportunity costs of getting an annual flu shot
• Why we can expect the immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccines to be inferior to that conferred by infection and the relevance of this to the SARS-CoV-2 “variants of concern” that have emerged
• How studies have indicated that infection with common human coronaviruses, which are a common cause of the common cold, confers immunity that is cross-protective to some extent against SARS-CoV-2 infection
• How, despite the fact that the mRNA from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines do not enter the cell nucleus, it remains theoretically possible that it could be incorporated into human DNA through the mechanism of reverse transcription (which is a mechanism that helps to explain why something like 10% of our own human DNA is viral in origin)
• How infections particularly during early childhood can confer long-term health benefits
• How the idea that the alarming rates of chronic illnesses including autoimmune diseases has absolutely nothing to do with mass indiscriminate use of pharmaceutical products specifically designed to permanently alter the functioning of children’s immune systems is totally ludicrous
• The importance of natural herd immunity as opposed to trying to reach herd immunity through mass vaccination
• How PCR tests have been used to perpetrate institutionalized scientific fraud serving to heighten the sense of mass panic and manufacture consent for authoritarian policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
• How there is a culture of deception and corruption in which scientists are afraid to speak out and tell the truth because they will face character assassination and could lose their funding or even their careers
• How Dr. Paul Thomas published a study in a peer-reviewed journal indicating that the unvaccinated patients in his Portland, Oregon practice are the healthiest children in his practice, with significantly less incidence of diagnoses and office visits for a broad range of illnesses, and how the Oregon Medical Board responded by issuing an “emergency” order to suspend his medical license on the grounds that his approach, which is to educate and obtain informed consent, constitutes of a threat to public health
• How the Oregon Medical Board ignored his data despite having requested him to produce peer-reviewed evidence to support his approach to vaccination, and how they had to come up with a false pretext in order to justify their suspension order because they couldn’t very will admit that the problem was that he respects parents’ right to informed consent
• How the message that the suspension order delivers to other physicians is that they’d better bully parents into vaccinating strictly according to the CDC’s routine childhood schedule because if they practice informed consent, they will risk losing their license
• How the media have framed the issue with the false dichotomy that people are either “pro” or “anti” vaccine to deflect focus from the real issue, which is that there is a war being waged against our fundamental human right to informed consent; it’s really about being either pro-informed-consent or anti-informed-consent