Reading Progress:

Interview: The Censorship of Inconvenient Truths about Vaccines

by May 19, 2021Articles, Economic Freedom, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates, Multimedia1 comment

(image by Christoph Scholz, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0)
Dr. Paul Thomas interviews me about how factual information that doesn't align with the mass vaccination agenda is being censored.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

I recently joined the heroic Dr. Paul Thomas on his show Against the Wind to discuss the problem of censorship. We’re being told that we must only consider a narrow spectrum of perspectives, that certain views are too dangerous for us to be exposed to. We’re being told that we must not consider certain information and think for ourselves in pursuit of truth, but that we must instead place our faith in government officials and the thought-controlling corporate media to determine the truth for us.

We must reject this paradigm. It is insulting to our intelligence. It is dangerous. The criterion they use as a pretext to prevent us from seeing certain information is that it is “misinformation”. But the real criterion is demonstrably not whether information is true but whether it aligns with the adopted political agenda. Thus, sharing inconvenient truths about authoritarian lockdown responses to COVID-19 or about vaccines will get you censored and potentially banned from social media platforms, while it’s deemed perfectly acceptable for the public health establishment to blatantly lie to the public in order to manufacture consent for the political agenda.

The first guest in this episode of Dr. Paul’s show is Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who pioneered research in to the association between gut disorders and autism. My interview begins at about the 56:25 mark. You’ll want to listen to Dr. Wakefield’s story, which I also briefly cover in my exposé “Oregon Medical Board Suspends Dr. Paul Thomas for Practicing Informed Consent”.

Dr. Paul is not done fighting on our behalf to defend our right to informed consent. But he faces an immense legal challenge. The episode with the state medical board is not over. He needs to raise the funds to continue battling on that front in the war that is being waged against our fundamental human rights.

I encourage my readers to support this heroic physician by becoming a member at his site DoctorsAndScience.com, where he hosts Against the Wind. You can also contribute to his legal fund on this page of his site PaulThomasMD.com.

Topics we discussed in the interview include:

  • How I got started doing independent journalism on the topic of vaccines
  • How what the government and media say science says and what science actually tells us are two completely different things
  • How the media serve the function of manufacturing consent for various political agendas
  • How Facebook and other social media companies are censoring truthful information while enabling the propagation of official disinformation about vaccines
  • Why I’ve expanded my social media usage to other platforms that do not engage in censorship
  • How Google terminated my ad account on the grounds that my site Foreign Policy Journal violated their community guidelines, which I believe was due to my having begun to post factual content challenging the authoritarian lockdown responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
  • How the argument that Facebook and others are private companies and so can set whatever terms they want is mistaken because their censorship is being done in service to the government for the purposes of manufacturing consent for government policies
  • How we need to keep getting the truth out by whatever means available to us and take great care not to legitimize the claim that members of the health freedom movement are spreading misinformation
  • How the message delivered by the censorship is that we must only consider a very narrow range of perspectives when it is absolutely essential for societal advancement that we consider as wide a variety of perspectives as possible and be willing to challenge our own beliefs
  • How we need to be willing to have potentially uncomfortable conversations with family and friends, to not be afraid of what others think of us for standing on principle and speaking out
  • How we should respect each others’ choices, but how even the simple act of advocating informed consent for vaccines is being defined as “anti-vaccine” “misinformation”
  • How one positive development is that the problem of censorship has entered the mainstream discourse with even world renowned scientists now being censored for telling truths that don’t align with the political agenda of lockdowns and their mass vaccination endgame

Scroll up to watch the full interview now or click here to watch it at DoctorsAndScience.com.

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

  • Marilyn Stephens says:

    I am discovering that the medical-political hegemony is preventing me access to science-based treatments that do not fall under the vail of vaccination and I’m asking for help on how I can find this access in Portland Oregon—please help me! I’m 67 and live alone. I was injured 10 years ago from an H1N1 jab. I continue to suffer chronic fatigue, adrenal failure and other Sx ever since this happened. I’m a seasoned mental health clinician and have observed over 20 years of neurological problems in adolescents and young adults who have exotic autoimmune and neurological problems. It’s an epidemic.

  • >
    Share via
    Copy link