Reading Progress:

Interview: Public Vaccine Policy vs. Public Health

by Sep 11, 2021Economic Freedom, Articles, Multimedia, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates2 comments

Senator Richard Pan, a practicing pediatrician, has led the California state government’s efforts to systematically violate parents’ right to informed consent for vaccinations (photo by Dr. Richard Pan, licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0)
In this interview, I explain how the policy goal of maintaining high vaccination rates is contrary to the goal of public health.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

I recently joined Bretigne Shaffer on her podcast What Then Must We Do? to discuss the topic of my new book The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board, which exposes how the medical establishment has been waging an all-out assault on our fundamental human rights and serving the pharmaceutical industry at the expense of public health. Topics we discussed include:

  • How the story of what happened to Dr. Paul Thomas is a microcosm of the bigger picture in which we are faced with perpetual governmental assaults on our right to informed consent, and how it highlights the need for people everywhere to stand up and fight for our health freedom
  • How Dr. Thomas published a peer-reviewed study comparing health outcomes between his variably vaccinated and completely unvaccinated pediatric patients and showed that the unvaccinated children had significantly less incidence of diagnoses and office visits for a broad range of conditions
  • How that the journal editors later retracted the study without any substantive criticism and without identifying even a single flaw that would justify the retraction, which indicates that the decision was not about science but politics
  • How the retraction was based on an anonymously written letter to the editors, and how the editors refused the study authors’ proposal to publish the letter and their response and instead withdrew the paper without substantiating their accusation that it was fatally flawed, again illustrating that their action had nothing to do with the science and everything to do with the fact that the study posed a challenge to public vaccine policy
  • How the study was done and what it showed, specifically, about the health of unvaccinated children compared to vaccinated children and why the findings threatened the public health establishment
  • How the fact that Dr. Thomas’s license was suspended by the Oregon Medical Board just days after the publication of his study, which was peer-reviewed evidence supporting his approach to vaccination that the board had demanded that he produce, illustrates that their motive was entirely political
  • How state governments have been trying to coerce parents into vaccinating strictly according to the CDC’s schedule by eliminating any means by which parents can obtain exemptions and punishing doctors for enabling parents to exercise their right to make their own informed choice
  • How one positive outcome from the governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic has been an increased awareness about the untrustworthiness of public health authorities and the seriousness of the threat to our health freedom
  • How the Oregon Medical Board’s suspension order communicates the message to other pediatricians throughout the state that they’d better bully parents into vaccinating their children according to the CDC’s schedule or risk losing their license
  • How the institution of medical licensing itself is detrimental rather than beneficial for public health, a means of exercising control over doctors to confine them to practicing within the narrow confines of mainstream medicine as determined by clueless bureaucrats with no knowledge of the circumstances or needs of individual patients
  • Why we need to replace the existing system of harmful government interventionism with a free market in health care
  • How the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a much greater awareness about the problem of censorship of any information that doesn’t align with the diktats of the public health establishment
  • The potential problem of “original antigenic sin” and why superior natural immunity should be understood as an opportunity cost of vaccination
  • Why the phenomenon of “antibody dependent enhancement” remains a serious concern about COVID‑19 vaccines
  • How vaccines can have “non-specific effects” that might not be detectable for years, but how it appears we will never have data from randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials for COVID‑19 vaccines comparing long-term health outcomes, including all-cause mortality, between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals
  • How the CDC has lowered the standard of evidence for COVID-19 vaccine safety specifically for pregnant women
  • How the control groups in the ongoing clinical trials have been vaccinated away so that we will never have the data we need on long-term health effects

At the end of our discussion, Bretigne said of my book The War on Informed Consent, “I think this is really one of the most important stories of our time.” I felt the same way when I learned of it, which is why I dropped everything else I had going on to write it.

Buy The War on Informed Consent.

Listen to the full interview now!

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

  • NorCal Vicious says:

    CDC lost ALL remaining credibility (they didn’t have much to begin with in my eyes) when they put out information into public schools and forums how to “Survive a ZOMBIE apocalypse”…. Now wait, a whaaaat….?! Correct me if I’m wrong, but to my knowledge, we have never, EVER had a deceased and rotting corpse, human or otherwise, reanimate itself, and feed off of living flesh, in how many THOUSANDS of years…?! There was one case that had a couple of minute (adj.) similarities to what a “zombie” story might sound like, but, it was disproven with a couple of x-rays back in 1936. So in roughly 300,000 years (if what they “tell” us is accurate again, *skeptical*) we have not had ONE single case of a “zombie”, yet CDC wasted how much/how many time/money/brain cells on training that they have NO experience in the history of our planet/existence, but, hey, they’re the “experts”, right?! And, it must be true/accurate, because, they would never lie, right…?! Either they know something we don’t (like how safe and effective vaccines are for example, the science proves it!) or as I began with, any remaining credibility has ceased to exist – for me anyways. See for yourself, go to CDC’s website and type “zombie” into the search bar. Happy reading!

  • >
    Share via
    Copy link