Reading Progress:

Interview: The Assault on Our Rights by the Vaccine Religion

by Oct 13, 2021Economic Freedom, Articles, Multimedia, Health Freedom, Interviews & Debates0 comments

(Photo by nts01, licensed under Pixabay License)
How public vaccine policies are driven by dogma, not science, and how the public health establishment is assaulting our right to informed consent.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

()

I recently joined Meryl Dorey on her show Under the Wire to discuss the topic of my new book The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board. The show is brought to us by the Australian Vaccination-risks Network (AVN). I love how they introduce my interview in the video description, so here it is:

Jeremy Hammond is that rare creature, long thought to be extinct but seen here and there in the wild—an independent investigative journalist. His writings have received widespread praise whether his subject matter is political, economic or health-related.

For the last few years, he has written nearly exclusively about vaccination and his latest book, The War on Informed Consent, tells the story of an ethical and caring health professional, Dr Paul Thomas, who was deregistered because of the danger his information posed to mainstream medical and pharmaceutical interests.

My interview begins at about the 9:30 mark in the video. Specific topics we covered include:

  • Why I felt it was critically important to drop everything else I was doing to take on the research and writing project that resulted in my book The War on Informed Consent, and why I feel this is such a vital story to be told.
  • How Dr. Paul Thomas published a study strongly indicating that his unvaccinated pediatric patients are the healthiest children in his practice.
  • How the Oregon Medical Board held an emergency meeting to suspend Dr. Thomas’s license just days after the publication of that study, and despite the fact that they were the ones who had demanded him to produce peer-reviewed evidence supporting his approach of practicing informed consent for vaccinations.
  • How authoritarians in positions of political power view the writing of medical exemptions for vaccinations by licensed physicians not as the practice of medicine but as an administrative function in service to the state, and how the statists are threatening and punishing doctors who dare to stray from pushing the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule on parents.
  • What informed consent is and why I say that the government is waging war against this fundamental human right.
  • How states have been eliminating so-called “non-medical” exemptions to vaccinations and so narrowly defining the criteria for a “medical” exemption that a child has to practically already have been injured by a vaccine in order to qualify for an exemption. (And sometimes, as in a specific case I discuss in my book involving the punishment of Dr. Bob Sears for writing an exemption, even previously experiencing vaccine injury isn’t enough.)
  • How Dr. Paul Thomas and his coauthor and data analyst Dr. James Lyons-Weiler designed their study and what they found when comparing health outcomes for vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
  • How they considered the argument that unvaccinated children are really just as unhealthy as vaccinated children but are just undiagnosed because their parents don’t utilize health care as much, and how they addressed that potential criticism of their study.
  • Why the measure they developed and termed “relative incidence of office visits” is important, and how it compares to the usual measure used in prior studies of incidence of diagnosis.
  • How the editors of the journal retracted the study on the basis of an anonymously written complaint and without providing any substantive explanation for their action, failing to identify even a single flaw or error that would warrant retraction, which indicates that the decision was purely political, not science-based.
  • Why the term “Wakefielded” is an appropriate description of what happened to Dr. Thomas.
  • How the media do public policy advocacy, not journalism (requiring me to step up and do their jobs for them).
  • How Biden literally argued that his federal vaccine mandate for the workplace was to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers! (Try to wrap your mind around that one!)
  • How even people who are already naturally immune are also being coerced into getting vaccinated in violation of their right to informed consent.
  • How the CDC has been lying that natural immunity is inadequate and inferior to the immunity conferred by vaccines when the truth is that natural immunity is strong, robust, durable, and vastly superior.
  • How the statement “vaccines are safe and effective” is not scientifically meaningful but a statement of dogma, and how saying anything straying from this dogma of the vaccine religion is regarded as heresy.
  • For example, how in April 2020, Facebook, in service to the vaccine religion, a subsect of the state religion, updated its policy to prohibit people from telling the truth that the COVID-19 vaccines were not FDA approved.
  • How the White House press secretary argued that people who spread misinformation on one social media platform should be banned from all other platforms, while hypocritically lying that the vaccines were FDA approved; thus, by its own standard, the White House should have been banned from all social media platforms for spreading disinformation.
  • Why confirmation bias and cognitive dissonance are such huge problems in the medical establishment, and why Dr. Paul Thomas is such a rare doctor for having the courage and honesty to question and challenge his own beliefs and medical training.
  • How witnessing four patients regress into autism after vaccination prompted Dr. Thomas to leave his group practice and open his own clinic grounded in the principle of respecting parents’ right to make their own informed choice about vaccinations.
  • How Dr. Thomas knew that he was risking his career by publishing his book The Vaccine-Friendly Plan.
  • How the Oregon Medical Board’s accusation that Dr. Thomas was “bullying” parents into not vaccinating is absurd on its face since parents flocked to him precisely because they were sick and tired of being bullied by every other pediatrician, and how this accusation was also completely hypocritical because the core message of its order suspending his license was that doctors had better bully their patients into complying with the CDC’s schedule or risk losing their license.
  • Why natural infection with SARS-CoV-2 confers a much broader repertoire of immune responses than vaccination.
  • How the vaccines are designed to elicit an immune response to the spike protein of a now extinct variant.
  • How the public was promised that vaccines were the solution to the pandemic as they would confer herd immunity, which was the explicitly stated endgame of the authoritarian lockdown regimes, but how that promise has proven to be false.
  • How vaccines can have long-term “non-specific effects” such as an increased risk of dying from causes other than the infectious disease the vaccine is designed to protect against.
  • Why we will never have data from randomized, placebo-controlled comparing long-term health outcomes, including all-cause mortality, between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.
  • How public health officials are using the term “breakthrough infection” in place of what is traditionally described in the medical literature as “vaccine failure”.
  • How the PCR tests being (mis)used to diagnose COVID-19 cannot determine what variant a person has been exposed to.
  • How our human rights are under assault from an institutionalized religion that is masquerading dogma as “science”.

To buy my book The War on Informed Consent, click here!

Rate This Content:

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

What do you think?

I encourage you to share your thoughts! Please respect the rules.

>
Share via
Copy link