The Superiority of Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
How the “public health” establishment brazenly lied about the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines versus natural immunity.
Since COVID-19 vaccines first received emergency use authorization from the FDA, the “public health” establishment has been propagating the claim that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes the disease, is insufficient and therefore that even people who’ve already recovered from infection still need to get vaccinated.
The truth is that studies have shown that natural immunity is robust, broad, durable, and far superior to that induced by vaccination.
In this series of articles, I exposed how the public has been lied to for the purpose of manufacturing consent for COVID-19 vaccines.
7-Part Series on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
The Superiority of Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2: Introduction
The public health establishment has been claiming that people who’ve recovered from SARS‑CoV‑2 infection still need to get a COVID‑19 vaccine because natural immunity is inferior, but that is a lie.
The Official Ignorance of Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
To push the political agenda of mass vaccination, the public health establishment has deceitfully ignored natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
The Lie That Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Is Weak and Short-Lived
To push their mass vaccination agenda, public health authorities have been lying that natural immunity may be short-lived when science tells us otherwise.
The Origins of the Lie That Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Wanes Rapidly
The foundations for the false propaganda narrative that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 affords insufficient protection were being laid while the COVID-19 vaccines were still under development.
Waning Antibodies ≠ Loss of Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Early false claims about rapidly lost natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 have served as the foundation for the persistent deception that superior immunity is conferred by vaccines.
Antibodies Persist with Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Contrary to the CDC’s public messaging, studies have shown that natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is durable, including persistent antibodies.
Antibodies Are More Durable with Natural Immunity Than with Vaccination
By the CDC’s own logic, we must conclude that natural immunity offers more durable protection against SARS-CoV-2 than COVID-19 vaccines.
Related Content
Here are some more selected articles I’ve written related to the superiority of natural immunity relative to the immunity induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (with the most recent first).
How the Media Conceal the Detrimental Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines on the Immune System
NBC reports Dr. Paul Offit’s view that young and healthy people should skip the bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster shots but deliberately omits the most important reasons why.
Another Omicron Booster Shot Study Reveals Original Antigenic Sin
Studies show that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines reformulated to include an Omicron component fail due to original antigenic sin.
COVID-19 Vaccinated People Equally Contagious as Unvaccinated Within 10 Weeks
Viral loads of COVID-19 vaccinated people suggest equal contagiousness as the unvaccinated within 10 weeks, while natural immunity endures.
Fact Check: Yes, COVID-19 Vaccines Were Sold to the Public Based on Lies
Contrary to faux “fact check” articles, the “public health” establishment did falsely claim that COVID 19 vaccines would prevent transmission.
Moderna Study Shows Negative Vaccine Effectiveness within 5 Months after a Booster Shot
A Moderna-funded study finds that three doses of its mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine result in negative effectiveness against infection with Omicron subvariants within five months.
Yet Another Study Showing Negative COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness
A Lancet preprint affirms previous findings of significantly negative effectiveness of COVID 19 vaccines against Omicron within several months.
Omicron Booster Shots and Original Antigenic Sin
A new study on antibodies induced by Omicron booster shots provides yet more evidence that “original antigenic sin” is a real problem.
ABC News Gets ‘Original Antigenic Sin’ Completely Wrong
ABC News offers a rare acknowledgment of original antigenic sin but completely misinforms about its significance with COVID-19 vaccines.
Fact Check: Yes, Dr. Birx did change her tune on COVID-19 vaccines
PolitiFact falsely claims that Dr. Deborah Birx never lied that COVID-19 vaccines would prevent virus transmission.
‘Original Antigenic Sin’ Is a Real Problem with COVID-19 Vaccines
Studies have now confirmed that “original antigenic sin”, or a detrimental fixation on a suboptimal immune response, is a real problem for people who’ve gotten COVID-19 vaccines.
Why COVID-19 Vaccines Cannot Stop the Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 Variants
The propaganda claim that mass vaccination can stop the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants is ridiculously persistent.
A Chronicle of Statements about Natural Immunity Once Deemed Misinformation But Now Admittedly True
Here is a record of statements about natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 once deemed misinformation but now admittedly true.
NPR Whitewashes the CDC’s Lies about Natural Immunity
The media want us to believe that the CDC’s position on natural immunity to SARS-CoV-2 has changed because the science has changed, but that isn’t true.
The CDC Finally Admits That Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Is Superior to the Immunity Induced by COVID-19 Vaccines
After long lying that natural immunity is weak and inferior, the CDC has finally admitted it offers better protection than COVID-19 vaccines.
The Real Reason Why Omicron Is a ‘Variant of Concern’
The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant is alarming to “public health” authorities because it fully exposes the failure of COVID-19 vaccines to live up to their promises.
NY Times Finally Acknowledges ‘Original Antigenic Sin’
The New York Times refreshingly acknowledges this theoretical risk of COVID-19 vaccines but fails to adequately explain its significance.
Fact Check: Does Natural Immunity Offer “Little” Protection Against Omicron?
The New York Times curiously tells us that 75% effectiveness from natural immunity against the Omicron variant is “little” protection while 33% effectiveness from vaccination “raises hope”.
Fact Checking the ‘Fact Checkers’ on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
The “fact checkers” are ridiculously telling us that we must completely ignore the scientific literature and instead accept the CDC’s proclamations as gospel truth.
About the Author
I am a truly independent journalist and Research Fellow at The Libertarian Institute whose work is focused on exposing dangerous mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.
I'm the author of several books, including Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict The War on Informed Consent, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent, which features a Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Topics I have covered over the years include 9/11 and the "war on terrorism", the war on Iraq, the Israel-Palestine conflict, the role of the Federal Reserve in the economy, and so-called "public health" policies including vaccines and the COVID-19 lockdown madness.
The aim of my work is to empower people with the knowledge needed to see through the lies and to create a brighter future for our children.
Stay updated with my work by signing up for my free newsletter, and also be sure to follow me and share the knowledge on social media!
