...

Reading Progress:

How the CDC Lies about the Safety of Aluminum in Vaccines

Dec 8, 2022

A baby receives an intramuscular vaccination in his right thigh (Public Domain photo by Amanda Mills, CDC, courtesy of Pixnio).
The CDC’s claim that the amount of aluminum children are exposed to by its vaccine schedule is “safe” is tantamount to scientific fraud.

Reading Time: ( Word Count: )

Introduction

One of the legitimate concerns that many parents have about adhering to the routine childhood vaccine schedule recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is that many vaccines contain aluminum, which is used as an “adjuvant”.

On a page of its website titled “Adjuvants and Vaccines”, the CDC explains the purpose of the aluminum by saying, “An adjuvant is an ingredient used in some vaccines that helps create a stronger immune response in people receiving the vaccine. In other words, adjuvants help vaccines work better.”

To reassure the public, the CDC states that “Aluminum salts, such as aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, and aluminum potassium sulfate have been used safely in vaccines for more than 70 years.” The CDC says that all aluminum-containing vaccines “are tested for safety and effectiveness in clinical trials before they are licensed for use in the United States” and are “continually monitored by CDC and FDA once they are approved.”

The page has been recently updated to acknowledge that a CDC study published in September 2022 found “a positive association between cumulative vaccine‑associated aluminum before age 24 months and persistent asthma at age 24 through 59 months among children with and without eczema.” For children with eczema, the finding was a 26 percent increased risk of asthma for every 1,000 micrograms of aluminum received by vaccination.

The CDC, however, downplays these findings by describing the study as having found a “possible” association, even though the increased risk of asthma in children with and without eczema was statistically significant and the study authors themselves acknowledge that a “positive association” was found. The CDC further describes the association between aluminum-containing vaccines and an increased risk of asthma as merely a “potential” safety signal rather than acknowledging it to be an existential safety signal.

Thusly downplaying the increased risk of asthma associated with aluminum exposure from vaccines, the CDC persists in its policy course and its longstanding claim that “the amount of aluminum exposure in people who follow the recommended vaccine schedule is low and is not readily absorbed by the body.”

“Previous scientific research has shown the amount of aluminum exposure in people who follow the recommended vaccine schedule is low and is not readily absorbed by the body.”

To support its claim that the cumulative levels of aluminum that children are exposed to by its routine childhood vaccine schedule is “low” and that the aluminum is readily eliminated from the body without causing toxic effects, the CDC cites a study by researchers from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). That study, conducted by Robert J. Mitkus et al. and published in the journal Vaccine in 2011, is titled “Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination”.

The FDA likewise cites the study by Mitkus et al. as having shown that “the risk to infants posed by the total aluminum exposure received from the entire recommended series of childhood vaccines over the first year of life is extremely low.”

However, that study does not support the government’s claims about vaccine safety. Indeed, the claims made by the CDC and FDA serve to illustrate the complete untrustworthiness of the “public health” establishment.

In truth, aluminum is a known neurotoxin that accumulates in tissues and organs, including the brain, and that plausibly causes neurological harms to children at the cumulative levels that children are exposed to by the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule.

Concerns about the potential toxic harms to children have been raised in the medical literature, but the CDC cherry-picks data to support its policies, as illustrated by how it cites the FDA study while willfully ignoring other research demonstrating the serious errors made by Mitkus et al. in their analysis.

Indeed, for these “public health” agencies to rely on that FDA study as proof that the aluminum in vaccines is “safe” amounts to outright scientific fraud.

🔓Continue reading with a FREE or premium membership.

Log in below or choose your membership.

Now you know. Others don’t. Share the knowledge.

About the Author

About the Author

I am an independent researcher, journalist, and author dedicated to exposing mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.

I write about critically important issues including US foreign policy, economic policy, and so-called "public health" policies.

My books include Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent.

To learn more about my mission and core values, visit my About page.

Share Your Thoughts

(You can format comments using simple HTML — <b>bold</b>, <i>italics</i>, and <blockquote>quoted text</blockquote>)

  • Tom M says:

    A great reason to be an anti-vaxxer. If I had kids, knowing what I know now about vaccines, I would take them and run for the hills. If aluminum was beneficial to humans, I am sure the body would offer some kind of biological mechanism to make it helpful. The same could be said about all the other junk they add to vaccines…many ingredients we never are told are present. WHY?

  • Bluesky says:

    Don’t forget the mercury ☿ too

  • Momo says:

    Killer journalism as always. I had to look up whether the other studies mentioned in the Vaccine Papers articles also gave the AlCl orally or injected it into the rodents. They administered it orally. Though that is certainly implied in your article, I would have found it even clearer to state it explicitly.

  • Momo says:

    Somehow, in the process of you quoting it, a typo was introduced into the Vaccine Papers quote:

    <>

    It became “does not included that”. Just FYI, feel free to delete this comment once resolved.

  • Gina says:

    I found myself in a convo re: aluminum in zeolite, and remembered your article – this one – from Twitter years ago, and knew I needed to find it and share. I remembered you (you’re awesome btw), and many long threads of you educating the ppl against the lies and liars. You won every point they came with lol
    But I couldn’t remember your name… somehow found you by searching. Very cool. Thanks for being here, Jeremy.

  • >
    182 Shares
    182 Shares
    Share via
    Copy link