DNA Contamination and Scientific Fraud in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Trial

Introduction

I highly encourage you to watch this episode of With the Wind with Dr. Paul Thomas, featuring guest Josh Guetzkow, an associate professor of sociology and criminology at Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

First, Dr. Thomas has some uplifting words for us for getting through tough times.

Then Thomas interviews Guetzkow, who explains recent research uncovering that the manufacturing process for the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine was switched during the clinical trial, so that most of the people in the trial got the version manufactured by “Process 1”, whereas the shot that was rolled out for global mass vaccination was manufactured by “Process 2”. Guetzkow describes this as a “bait and switch” tactic.

The altered manufacturing process, which was done to be able to mass produce the mRNA for the global mass vaccination campaign, ultimately resulted in contamination of the vaccines with DNA encoding the SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein, which heightens concerns about the theoretical possibility of integration of genetic instructions from the vaccine being integrated into human DNA.

Guetzkow discusses the potential health risks resulting from what amounts to scientific fraud facilitated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Later in the show, Dr. thomas explains why he no longer stands behind his book The Vaccine-Friendly Plan. This is really an episode that you won’t want to miss!

Persecuted for Making the CDC Look Bad

In the first segment, Dr. Thomas describes the struggle he has gone through first trying to keep his license and continue his pediatric practice in Portland in the face of persecution from the Oregon Medical Board, and then dealing with having to surrender his license due to the insurmountable obstacle posed by his legal battle with the state government.

I tell his story in my book The War on Informed Consent, which features a Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. To briefly summarize, Dr. Thomas came under fire from the board after publishing his book The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, which advocates an individualized approach to determining the risks versus benefits of vaccinations, as opposed to the one-size-fits-all approach of public vaccine policy that is “standard of care” in pediatric practices across the country.

Whereas the state’s goal was to achieve high vaccination rates, Thomas’s conflicting goal was to achieve good health outcomes for his pediatric patients.

The board demanded that Thomas produce peer-reviewed evidence to support his alternative approach, which, in collaboration with Dr. James Lyons-Weiler of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), he proceeded to do.

The pair published a study on November 22, 2020, indicating that Thomas’s completely unvaccinated patients were the healthiest children in his practice. Just days after producing the evidence that the board had asked for, the board held an “emergency” meeting to suspend his license on the grounds that his alternative approach represented a threat to public health.

The irony is that the CDC has never supported its own approach by producing a study comparing health outcomes between children vaccinated according to its routine childhood schedule and children who remained completely unvaccinated.

The study by Thomas and Lyons-Weiler was later retracted by the publishing journal for reasons that were obviously political, not scientific. In short, the retraction was preposterously based on an anonymously written letter of complaint to the editors. The anonymous author absurdly speculated that their findings were not because unvaccinated children are truly healthier but because the parents of unvaccinated children just don’t care enough about their children’s health to take them in to see the doctor, and therefore they are just as sick as vaccinated children but remain undiagnosed.

In fact, the study already included an analysis to address the hypothesis that the lower incidence of diagnoses for various health conditions among unvaccinated children was due to differences in health care usage between parents who vaccinate their children and parents who don’t. Thomas and Lyons-Weiler showed that, while vaccinated children had more office visits for fever, as expected since fever is a known adverse event caused by vaccines, they were not more attendant at routine well-child visits.

Although Thomas was forbidden by the board from participating in any further research using his practice’s clinical data, Dr. Lyons-Weiler with Dr. Russell Blaylock published a follow-up conducting several additional analyses showing that Thomas’s unvaccinated patients showed up for routine well-child visits just as much as vaccinated patients, if not more so.

For more information about the journal editors’ disgraceful retraction of the original study and the findings of the follow-up analyses, read my follow-up article “Breakthrough Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier”.

In the first segment of the above episode of With the Wind, Thomas opens up about his personal struggles and offers this excellent piece of wisdom for getting through hard times: “From our deepest struggles come the most amazing opportunities for growth. In fact, I don’t think we really grow well or quickly without struggle.”

Later in the episode, he explains why he now views his book The Vaccine-Friendly Plan as “not friendly enough”. That segment, which I’ll share some additional thoughts on below, is also well worth watching.

Pfizer’s “Bait and Switch”

In the interview segment, Josh Guetzkow discusses recent research showing that the manufacturing process used for the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine results in the shots being contaminated with DNA encoding the spike protein of SARS‑CoV‑2, as well as something called an SV40 promoter, which is a genetic piece of a monkey virus called “simian virus 40”.