Spike Protein Found in Blood 6 Months After mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination

A study published in the journal Proteomics Clinical Applications on August 31, 2023, found persistence of spike protein in the blood of people who received mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines at six months after vaccination.

One possible explanation for this, the study authors suggested, is the integration of vaccine mRNA into the host cells.

The mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines are designed to cause human cells to produce the spike protein of SARS‑CoV‑2, the coronavirus that causes COVID‑19.

Since the vaccines first received emergency use authorization from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020, the “public health” establishment has claimed that both the mRNA and spike protein from COVID‑19 vaccines are cleared from the body “within days”.

The media’s faux “fact check” industry and its partnership with social media companies served to suppress discussion of the mRNA and spike protein persisting longer in the body.

Similarly, the “public health” establishment has maintained from the start that the vaccine mRNA cannot possibly become integrated into human DNA, and the “fact checkers” served their purpose of suppressing online discussion about the possibility that the supposed “authorities”, like those from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), could be wrong.

Yet, it has been known for some time within the scientific community that both the vaccine mRNA and the spike protein can persist in vaccinated individuals for at least several months.

A study published in the Journal of Immunology in November 2021 found “exosomes carrying spike protein” at two weeks since administration of the first dose of vaccine, and they observed persistence of spike protein at a time point of four months after the second dose.

A study in the journal Cell in January 2022 found vaccine mRNA in lymph nodes “on days 7, 16, and 37 postvaccination, with lower but still appreciable specific signal at day 60.” Similarly, they found “spike antigen still present as late as 60 days post-second dose.”

A study in the Journal of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology found vaccine mRNA in the blood of some individuals at a time point of 28 days postvaccination. The authors remarked that the persistence of vaccine mRNA would allow “prolonged spike protein production”.

The new study in Proteomics Clinical Applications found spike protein in the blood of half of patient samples tested at least 69 days (over two months) and in some cases at a time point of 187 days (over six months), which was the last timepoint observed.

To this day, the CDC’s website continues to falsely state that “The mRNA from the vaccines is broken down within a few days after vaccination and discarded from the body.”

The CDC also maintains that “These vaccines do not enter the nucleus of the cell where our DNA (genetic material) is located, so it cannot change or influence our genes.”

The “Myths and Facts about COVID‑19 Vaccines” page of the CDC’s website says that it’s a “MYTH” that COVID‑19 vaccines can alter human DNA. It is a “FACT”, according to the CDC, that “COVID‑19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way.”

The CDC’s reasoning is once again that the vaccine mRNA “never enters the nucleus of your cells, which is where your DNA is kept.”

Since the start, the “fact checkers” have been busy maintaining the CDC’s position and working to suppress any discussion of the theoretical possibility of vaccine mRNA being integrated into human DNA.

However, the CDC’s argument is a non sequitur fallacy: it does not logically follow from the fact that the mRNA doesn’t enter the cell nucleus that therefore it cannot be incorporated into host DNA.

This is because there is a known mechanism by which mRNA can be reverse transcribed into DNA, which then can potentially enter the cell nucleus and be incorporated into host DNA.

On the rare occasions when the phenomenon of reverse transcription is acknowledged by the “fact checkers”, they argue that since the vaccine mRNA does not encode for the enzyme necessary for this to occur, therefore it cannot happen.

But that, too, is a non sequitur fallacy because the body produces its own reverse transcriptase enzymes.

Illustrating the fallacy, a study published in Current Issues in Molecular Biology in February 2022 demonstrated reverse transcription of vaccine mRNA into DNA in the lab using a human liver cell line. (The study did not go further to determine whether the DNA then entered the cell nucleus to become incorporated into the cellular DNA.)

Additionally, studies have shown that RNA from SARS‑CoV‑2 itself can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of virus-infected cells.

The author of a study published in Genes in April 2022 discussed the “pervasive claim that mRNA-based vaccines cannot alter genomes”, which, “surprisingly”, was “widely stated in the mRNA vaccine literature but never supported by referencing any primary scientific papers that would specifically address this question.” It was “even more puzzling” considering the known mechanisms by which integration of the mRNA into host DNA could occur.

While it remains unknown whether the mRNA is reverse transcribed into DNA in the body and, if so, whether this genetic material is incorporated into the DNA of vaccinated individuals, this process might not even be required for the mRNA to be integrated into human DNA.

That’s because the vaccines have been found to be contaminated with plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process.

The new study in Proteomics Clinical Applications offered three hypotheses to explain their finding of persistence of vaccine mRNA at a time point as late as six months postvaccination.

The first is that “It is possible that the mRNA may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells.”

Another is that the mRNA-containing nanoparticle is integrated into bacterial cells that then steadily produce the spike protein.

A third hypothesis proposed by the authors relates to how the vaccine mRNA encodes for a genetically modified SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein: “pseudo-uridines at a particular sequence position” might “induce the formation of a spike protein that is always constitutively active.” The authors remarked, however, that this “seems very remote as a hypothesis.”

That left one of the two explanations involving vaccine mRNA being integrated into host cells—either human or bacterial—as being most likely.

“The question of whether or not the vaccine RNA can be integrated into the lymphocyte or other body cells”, the authors stated, “is much debated.”

That this scientific debate exists must surely be news to anyone getting their information from the government and mainstream media, who have farcically tried to maintain that there is nothing about it to debate.

Illustrating the contempt for truth that is so pervasive within not only the government and media establishments, but also within the scientific community, a “study” by academics from the school of “public health” at the University of Massachusetts published in JAMA Open Network on August 15, 2023, set out to determine what types of “misinformation” about COVID‑19 had been propagated by physicians in the US.

Absurdly, the researchers defined “misinformation” as any information that was “unsupported by or contradicting” information from the CDC.

Facts be damned!

The moral of the story is that facts simply don’t matter when there is a political and financial agenda to be served. The government lies, compliant academics seeking funding support the cause by conducting science-like activities, and the mainstream media dutifully manufacture consent for criminal government policies instead of doing journalism.