The WHO’s Diabolical Infertility Vaccine

A couple of years ago, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s organization Children’s Health Defense (CHD) published a short film by Dr. Andrew Wakefield reviewing the evidence that women in Africa were sterilized without their knowledge through the use of an infertility vaccine under the guise of a World Health Organization (WHO) tetanus vaccination campaign.

It’s titled “Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda“, which I finally just watched and recommend. It’s free to watch by signing up for CHD’s newsletters at InfertilityMovie.org.

Here’s the website’s bullet-point summary of what you’ll learn in the documentary:

• The chilling, harrowing story of how a World Health Organization (WHO) population control experiment, under the guise of a vaccination program, resulted in the sterilization of millions of women in Africa without their knowledge or consent.
• How the ability to carry a pregnancy to term has been tragically stripped away from these women as their government attempts to cover up the evidence.
• About a brave, Kenyan doctor — Dr. Stephen Karanja — who warned the world that once they’re done with Africa, they’re coming for the children and everyone else.

This is a topic I’ve never written anything about, but I am generally aware of the controversy, having done a modest amount of past research into it. Following are a few resources from my research archive for further reading.

In 1968, the Rockefeller Foundation published an annual report bemoaning that “Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.

In 1987, the Bulletin of the World Health Organization published an article titled “Development of immunological methods of fertility regulation“, the abstract of which states,

A new approach to fertility regulation is the development of vaccines directed against human substances required for reproduction…. Several vaccines targeted at the beta chain of the human chorionic gonadortrophin [hCG] molecule have reached the clinical trial stage … and the preliminary results are very encouraging.

In 1988, a Rockefeller Foundation annual report had a section on “population sciences” having the aim “to enhance reproductive choice in the developing world by supporting work to develop new contraceptive technologies”. The report noted that the foundation was “helping a number of institutions in sub-Saharan Africa to strengthen training and research in the population sciences”, including “collaborative research projects designed to develop and test new contraceptives” in African countries, including Kenya, Nigeria, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.

The report included this paragraph providing an update on the development of infertility vaccines:

India’s National Institute of Immunology successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation, the trials established that with each of the tested vaccines, at least one year of protection against pregnancy could be expected, based on the levels of antibodies formed in response to the immunization schedule.

As explained in Wakefield’s film, the vaccine is intended to cause an autoimmune response so that antibodies target hCG, thus causing infertility.

An update on the development of infertility vaccines was provided in a 1991 article in the journal Human Reproduction titled “The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formulation, objectives and research activities“. It explained how the WHO task force “has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines”, and it noted that ” a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing”.

In 1992, the WHO published a report titled “Fertility Regulating Vaccines“, or FRVs. In its conclusion, the WHO noted how women’s health advocates had expressed numerous concerns about these products, including “the potential for abuse of FRVs”.

In 1997, a Rockefeller Foundation-funded update on the development and testing of FRVs in clinical trials was published in Human Reproduction in an article titled “Fertility regulating and immunotherapeutic vaccines reaching human trials stage“.

In 2006, an article with the title “Population control in the new world order” was published in the journal Development in Practice. Its author, Betsy Hartmann, the Director of the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, expressed concerns “about the ways in which population-control programmes can violate basic human rights and can be a form of violence against women.”

As Hartmann explained,

Contraceptive vaccines, which immunise women against a hormone produced early in pregnancy, are likely to prove … medically and ethically problematic. Although one vaccine has been tested on only 180 women in India, it is being billed there as ‘safe, devoid of any side effects and completely reversible’. The scientific community knows very well that such assertions are false — for instance, many questions still remain about the vaccine’s long-term impact on the immune system and menstrual cycle. There is also evidence on film of women being denied information about the vaccine in clinical trials. Nevertheless, the vaccine is being prepared for large-scale use.

Meanwhile, the Human Reproduction Programme of the WHO is also testing its own contraceptive vaccine. At a 1989 WHO symposium the chairperson summarised the debate:

Foremost in my mind during these discussions was our difficulty in assessing the urgency of the demographic crisis. To the extent that the impact of that crisis increases, the need for more effective family planning methods must increase. At the very least, failure to develop something that might provide a more effective technology would be to take a grave and unnecessary risk.

What about the grave and unnecessary risks taken with women’s health? Genuine choice entails real power, not being on the receiving end of a system designed to control your body as a means of controlling world population growth.

A paper documenting the scandal of the infertility vaccine’s evident use in Africa in violation of women’s right to informed consent was published in the Open Access Library Journal, written by John W. Oller et al. and titled “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World“.

The authors conclude,

Laboratory testing of the TT [tetanus toxoid] vaccine used in the WHO Kenya campaign 2013-2015 showed that some of the vials contained a TT/βhCG conjugate consistent with the WHO’s goal to develop one or more anti-fertility vaccines to reduce the rate of population growth, especially in targeted LDCs [less developed countries] such as Kenya. While it is impossible to be certain how the βhCG got into the Kenya vaccine vials testing positive for it, the WHO’s deep history of research on antifertility vaccines conjugating βhCG with TT (and other pathogens), in our opinion, makes the WHO itself the most plausible source of the βhCG conjugate found in samples of “tetanus” vaccine being used in Kenya in 2014.

The controversy evidently did not halt efforts to develop and test infertility vaccines. A review of their continued development was provided in a 2018 Nature article titled “A shot at contraception“, which explains how the anti-hCG vaccine being developed for the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation works:

hCG is made by the embryo early after fertilization and isn’t produced until the onset of pregnancy. This unique aspect of hCG is the very reasons why it is used as a reliable test of pregnancy. Importantly, hCG is essential for implantation of the embryo in the uterine lining. So, if a vaccine were to generate antibodies neutralizing hCG…, implanataion of the embryo would be blocked, thereby preventing development of a fetus.

And if you think the WHO would never have the gall to experiment upon Africans without their informed consent, think again. I documented how the WHO did just that with an experimental malaria vaccine in my March 2020 article “WHO Experimenting on African Children without Informed Consent”, which was cited by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in his book The Real Anthony Fauci.

Get that full story here: