...

Defense of HepB Vaccine Birth Dose Reveals Vaccine Religion

Attorney Aaron Siri usefully illuminates the faith-based arguments used to defend the indiscriminate birth dose of HepB vaccine.

by Jeremy R. Hammond

Dec 16, 2025

… read
READING PROGRESS: 0%

In this episode of The Highwire, host Del Bigtree talks to attorney Aaron Siri about the hysterical establishment reactions to the idea of delaying the hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine for most infants who are not at risk of the infection.

The CDC's vaccine advisory committee under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., recently voted to delay the first does of the three-dose series until after the age of two months.

This policy change is very marginal in nature, and yet it provoked sheer outrage among public vaccine policy apologists.

The objections illuminate how the practice of vaccination is not grounded in science but faith.

Siri usefully observes the following critical self-contradiction by those arguing against this change in CDC policy:

  • When there's an absence of data on effectiveness, it's a reason to continue an existing CDC vaccine recommendation.
  • When the absence of data is on safety, it's a reason to continue an existing recommendation.

And, of course, anyone who doesn't agree with that illogic is an "anti-science" "anti-vaxxer".

The point made about the need to know the "number needed to vaccinate" (NNV) to prevent a single case of chronic HepB infection born to a non-carrier mother is also critical if you want to understand the "controversy" about the very marginal CDC policy update that the vaccine faithful are up in arms about.

And Siri also asks the critical question of why vaccine manufacturers need to have legal immunity against injury lawsuits if their products are so safe.

To learn more about the criminal insanity of the CDC's universal recommendation to indiscriminately vaccinate all newborn babies on the first day of their lives, see my article for Children's Health Defense:

And here's a four-minute summary:

Siri was also involved in the recent Supreme Court ruling opening the path to religous exemptions that I expressed mixed feelings about here:

And Siri also testified at the Senate hearing in September at which he revealed data from a censored study showing that unvaccinated children are healthier. For that fully story, see here:

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I’m an independent journalist exposing the state propaganda that manufactures public consent for criminal government policies.

My work examines US foreign policy, market interventionism, and so-called "public health" policy through one consistent lens: an uncompromising application of the non-aggression principle that transcends the narrow linear spectrum of "left" vs. "right".

Read about my mission and core values →

Essential Reading

Richard Perle appearing on "After Dark", June 10, 1989. (Open Media Ltd / Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)

Foreign Policy, News & Analysis

The Reasons for Regime Change in Iraq

September 6, 2007

Baby was receiving his scheduled vaccine injection in his right thigh muscle ie intramuscular injection public domain image is in public domain. (https://www.public-domain-image.com/)

Health Freedom, Special Reports

American Academy of Pediatrics Refuses to Back Vaccine Claims with Science

March 28, 2017

WHO Chief Scientist Lies about Vaccine Safety

Health Freedom, Special Reports

Fact Check: WHO Scientist Caught Lying to Public about Vaccine Safety

February 11, 2020

Join the Discussion

Your first comment is briefly held for approval to keep out spam and trolls; after that, your comments post instantly. Please keep discussion civil and on topic — see the comment policy.

Formatting: <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i>, <a href="URL">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

  • Alexandra Goldburt says:

    Siri is awesome. I’m reading his book “Vaccines, Amen” right now, and it is very very good.

    I’m wondering, though… where does he stand on Israel? His bio at the end of the book states: “…[Aaron Siri] clerked for the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Israel where he advised the Chief Justice of relevant American, English and International Law precedent, including removal of Israel’s citizens from the Gaza Strip”.

    I’m not to sure what to make of it….

    It would be so awesome to apply a mind as sharp as Siri’s to take apart the deception of Israeli hasbara the way he applied it take away Big Pharma’s lies. But, I don’t think it will ever happen…

    Perhaps I want too much. We need one issue people – they are more effective this way. And yet, there’s more than one important issue in the world, and when you see the big picture, all those issues are connected.

    And here is my opportunity to thank you once again, Jeremy, for being on top of it on both Israel AND vaccines.

    • It is unfortunate that this is so much overlap with Zionist ideology within the health freedom movement. I was disturbed and disheartened by the responses of many of my own readers after 10/7 when I started writing again about the Israel-Palestine conflict and speaking out against Israel’s genocide in Gaza. I don’t think I’d ever gotten so much hate mail, including the usual stupid accusations of “anti-Semite”. (Never mind both the Foreword and Introduction to my book Obstacle to Peace being written by Jews.)

      That’s a pretty cryptic statement about Siri advising Israel’s chief justice about “removal of Israel’s citizens from the Gaza Strip”. My guess is this means he pointed out the illegality of Israel’s settlements there, but it could also mean he took the view that Jewish settlers should not be forcibly removed as occurred in 2005.

      I’m of the view myself that international law requires a cessation of settlement activity but not necessarily removal of Jews already living in occupied Palestinian territory. I argue this in the Conclusion to Obstacle to Peace:

      On the question of Israeli settlements, having been established in violation of international law, the fact of their existence does not confer to the state of Israel rights to the land upon which they have been built. All private land stolen for their development should be returned to its rightful owners, whose options would include selling or allowing the current residents to continue living there as tenants. In the case of housing developments on land considered to be public Palestinian property, any Jews who wish to continue their residence there following the complete withdrawal of occupying military forces should be allowed to do so, to live side by side with their Arab neighbors as fellow Palestinians. Those who would prefer not to remain as residents of Palestine would be equally free to move to Israel, or elsewhere. Any abandoned housing units could be utilized to provide shelter to Palestinian refugees as part of an organized resettlement program. Israel would have an incentive to coordinate with the government of Palestine under such a program if the transfer of Israel’s improvements and developments on that stolen land was considered part of a compensation package in furtherance of the goal of a just resolution to the refugee problem and settlement of all claims against Israel.

      https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/product/obstacle-to-peace/

  • >

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This