...

Russia and Iran Point Out the U.S. Hypocrisy on Syria

Russia didn’t take too kindly to the hypocrisy of the U.S. criticizing it for this while itself helping to arm the rebels and thus escalating the conflict and violence.

by Jeremy R. Hammond

Jun 15, 2012

… read
READING PROGRESS: 0%

I commented yesterday on how the U.S. is acting to escalate the conflict in Syria while hypocritically accusing Russia of the same, with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticizing Russia for sending helicopters to the Assad regime. I already pointed out that Clinton was lying, but here’s a little more info.

As a Pentagon official put it, talking to the New York Times, “She put a little spin on it to put the Russians in a difficult position.” Yes, “a little spin”. Turns out Syria had owned these helicopters for a long time, having bought them in the ‘80s and ‘90s, and signed a contract to have them overhauled and repaired in Russia. So Russia was just returning these old helicopters that Syria already owned in accordance with the contract.

Russia didn’t take too kindly to the hypocrisy of the U.S. criticizing it for this while itself helping to arm the rebels and thus escalating the conflict and violence. Foreign Minister Sergey V. Lavrov returned, “We don’t supply Syria or anyone else with things that are used in fighting peaceful demonstrators, unlike the United States, which regularly supplies the region with such special equipment—one such shipment went to one of the Gulf countries recently, but for some reason the Americans consider this to be in order.”

The reference was probably to Bahrain, where the U.S. has its Fifth Fleet based and where it has helped the autocratic regime suppress peaceful demonstrators with violence, including by arming it and giving Saudi Arabia a green light to send in its own military to help suppress the demonstrations. The U.S., of course, has long helped provide the despotic Saudi regime with the tools required to suppress its own population. The list is long.

The Iranian foreign minister similarly responded to Clinton’s hypocrisy by saying, “They have some of their forces operating inside Syria.” He was presumably referring to rebel groups the U.S. is helping to fund and arm as a proxy in an effort to overthrow the Assad regime. “They say they want to prevent massacres but at the same time send weapons—these are double standards.”

Indeed.

About Jeremy R. Hammond

About Jeremy R. Hammond

I’m an independent journalist exposing the state propaganda that manufactures public consent for criminal government policies.

My work examines US foreign policy, market interventionism, and so-called "public health" policy through one consistent lens: an uncompromising application of the non-aggression principle that transcends the narrow linear spectrum of "left" vs. "right".

Read about my mission and core values →

Essential Reading

Richard Perle appearing on "After Dark", June 10, 1989. (Open Media Ltd / Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)

Foreign Policy, News & Analysis

The Reasons for Regime Change in Iraq

September 6, 2007

Iraq's Osirak nuclear reactor in the aftermath of Israel's attack on June 7, 1981 (George Washington University National Security Archive/CC BY-SA 4.0)

Foreign Policy, News & Analysis

Lessons Unlearned from Israel’s Bombing of Iraq’s Osirak Reactor

June 26, 2025

3D print of a SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (NIH/Public Domain)

Health Freedom, Special Reports

Fact Check: COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA and Spike Protein Are Not Cleared ‘Within Days’

June 28, 2022

Join the Discussion

Your first comment is briefly held for approval to keep out spam and trolls; after that, your comments post instantly. Please keep discussion civil and on topic — see the comment policy.

Formatting: <b>bold</b>, <i>italic</i>, <a href="URL">link</a>, <blockquote>quote</blockquote>

  • This is true, but what is also true is that governments of the ME are all bad to their peoples and affected by high theft of lands’ fortunes, which cause uprisals….

  • >

    Pin It on Pinterest

    Share This