I was back on The Fifth Dimension podcast with Evan McDermod to discuss how the FDA has stopped even pretending to science with its continued “emergency use” authorizations of COVID‑19 vaccines.
This is the focus of my free e-book The FDA, COVID-19 Vaccines, and Scientific Fraud: How the US Government Puts Children’s Health at Risk in Service to the Pharmaceutical Industry, available exclusively to my newsletter subscribers. If you aren’t subscribed yet, sign up for my newsletter and get the free e-book here.
Topics we covered include:
- The numerous layers to the FDA’s antibody “immunobridging” fraud that served as the basis for the authorization of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine for “emergency use” in infants and toddlers.
- How the FDA allowed Pfizer to change the study protocol mid-trial because the vaccine was failing to meet the FDA’s already fraudulent criterion.
- How the “public health” establishment claimed that a loss of antibodies capable of neutralizing the virus meant the loss of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 as the basis for the claim that natural immunity was weak and short-lived; and then how they suddenly seemed to discover the existence of cellular immunity, which continues to protect against severe disease, once the data started showing a rapid loss of antibody protection against infection.
- How the CDC applied two completely different criteria for whether a person should boost their immunity with a COVID‑19 vaccine depending on whether the person already had natural immunity or not: the naturally immune were told get a shot to ostensibly boost their protection against reinfection, whereas in the face of admitted rapid waning of vaccine protection against infection, the already vaccinated were by contrast told to get a booster to protect against severe disease.
- How the FDA authorized the vaccine for infants and toddlers in the absence of data demonstrating efficacy.
- How studies have demonstrated that “original antigenic sin” is a real problem with COVID‑19 vaccines.
- How the FDA and CDC are perpetrating another fraud by pushing booster shots containing Omicron components on the implicit grounds that this will adapt the antibody responses of people vaccinated with the original vaccine to be specific to the Omicron subvariants.
- How the FDA has acted to ensure that vaccine manufacturers will not need to conduct clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of new COVID‑19 vaccines like the new booster formulation.
- How the government has acted to protect the manufacturers against legal liability for harms caused by their vaccines.
- How one motivation for the government to so unscientifically push these products on children who are already naturally immune or otherwise at very low risk from COVID‑19 is so that the manufacturers can jump from the liability protections offered under “authorized for emergency use” status to liability protections offered as a product recommended by the CDC for routine use in children.
- How to support its authorization for infants and toddlers, the FDA systematically misinformed about the risks to children of death from COVID‑19, Long Covid, MIS‑C, and myocarditis. (Note: I mistakenly started talking about MIS‑C while referring to information about myocarditis. I later corrected myself, but just keep this in mind as you watch so you know what I meant when I discuss the FDA’s deliberate deception involving absolute versus relative risk.)
- How a hoax Reuters “fact check” article, about a study out of Thailand reporting rates of adverse cardiovascular events in adolescents after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID‑19 vaccine, falsely claimed that the study did not find that about 1 in 3 participants had adverse heart effects and falsely claimed it did not find that 1 in 43 were diagnosed with heart inflammation, even though those are in fact findings of the study.
- The importance of being skeptical, recognizing propaganda, and checking cited sources because it is very typical for mainstream media to cite sources either that do not support or that directly contradict the claims for which they are cited.
- How one positive outcome from the government responses to COVID‑19 has been a mass awakening as to the complete untrustworthiness of the entire so-called “public health” establishment.
- How the CDC has been adamant about not doing the type of study that parents are demanding to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines, and why the CDC refuses to do this science.
- How, to support its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”, the CDC cites an Institute of Medicine Review that acknowledges that none of the studies it reviewed were actually designed to test the hypothesis that vaccines can contribute to the development of autism in genetically susceptible children.
- How the entire body of research into what they call “vaccine hesitancy” in the medical literature is premised on the assumption that there are no legitimate reasons for parents not to strictly comply with the CDC’s childhood schedule, and how it is aimed at developing more effective propaganda to overcome this problem of parents having legitimate concerns without actually addressing those concerns.
- How the perception of the government as “regulating” the vaccine industry is false because the government is the vaccine industry.
- How when it comes to assuring people about the safety of vaccines, the “public health” establishment says not to worry because they monitor the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to monitor for postmarketing safety signals, but with VAERS screaming safety signals about COVID‑19 vaccines, suddenly, we are told that VAERS data is unreliable and cannot be used to draw conclusions about vaccine safety.
- Why it’s so important to help share the knowledge on social media despite the ridiculous ongoing censorship of truth to protect government-sanctioned disinformation, and how to reach people suffering under the delusion that “public health” officials are trustworthy.
Related content:
The Superiority of Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 (multi-part series)
