Interview: The Coerced Vaccination Endgame of Lockdowns

I joined Nate the Voluntaryist once again on his podcast to discuss many facets how the mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines were sold to the public on the basis of lies, with people being deceived or coerced into getting vaccinated. He has a unique format where he shows me video clips and gets my reactions to them.

Nate kicked it off by showing a video of people injured by COVID‑19 vaccines telling their story, including how they were then gaslighted by family, friends, and doctors who deny the existence of vaccine injuries. Numerous of the injured people described having been censored from social media simply for sharing their own experiences, and how doctors refused to report their adverse events to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

I then discussed the use of deception and coercion to further the mass vaccination endgame of the authoritarian lockdown measures.

Next, Nate shared a video of Senator Rand Paul confronting NIAID Director Anthony Fauci about the “public health” establishment’s recommendation of COVID‑19 vaccines for young children who are at very low risk from the disease. As Paul correctly noted, this decision was made despite no studies demonstrating effectiveness for this age group, with a measurement of antibodies in the blood post-vaccination instead being used as a surrogate measure of immunity. Paul also confronted Fauci about how much money he and other NIH scientists receiving royalties from the pharmaceutical industry, to which Fauci instructively responded by saying that NIH employees are not required to disclose that information.

I elaborated by providing examples of how Fauci had repeatedly lied throughout the pandemic and remarking how the government’s “public health” agencies are irredeemably corrupt, and how we would be much better off without them. Fortunately, there has been a huge increase in public awareness of just how completely untrustworthy the CDC is. I also discussed the importance of using social media to get the truth out despite having to deal with censorship of truths that don’t align with government policies.

The next video Nate showed was an advertisement for a health ID app suggestive of a “vaccine passport” system, with one part of the ad highlighting how the app would make it easier for you to “get your mandatory vaccination”.

My initial reaction was to think this must be a parody. I pointed to the ad as an example of why we must not let down our guard just because lockdowns have ended; we must keep up the fight to prevent the government from ever again abusing their power by systematically violating human rights.

The next clip was of the White House’s press conference early in the pandemic selling the initial lockdown measures as being “15 days to slow the spread”.

I explained why this was a false pretext for lockdowns. As I had been pointing out since March 2020, the real endgame of the lockdowns was not “two weeks to flatten the curve” but coerced mass vaccination. In my opposition to the lockdowns, I was also advocating a strategy of focused protection from the very start—six months before the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration famously advocated that sensible alternative than deliberately wrecking the economy. I also discuss how the claimed benefits of lockdowns never manifested in the data.

The next clip was of a virologist discussing the need for herd immunity in a World Economic Forum (WEF) video about COVID‑19 from early in the pandemic. The video highlighted how herd immunity could be achieved by natural immunity or vaccination while suggesting that natural immunity might be short-lived.

I had much to say about this. Early into the mass vaccination campaign, I wrote a whole series of articles exposing the lies that “public health” authorities were telling about natural immunity. The purpose of their lies was to deceive people into believing that natural immunity would likely provide insufficient protection, and so even people who’ve already recovered from infection should still get vaccinated. The nature of the propaganda shows that it had nothing to do with public health; it was all about power, control, and profits for the pharmaceutical industry.

I also explain why I predicted that the mass vaccination campaign would serve to prolong the pandemic and worsen long-term outcomes. During this segment, I explained the immunologic phenomenon of “original antigenic sin” and why we must understand natural immunity to be an opportunity cost of vaccination.

After Nate showed a video compilation of people seizing and passing out on live TV, I discussed how the FDA lied that the bivalent booster shots would “update” antibodies to be specific to the Omicron variant, and how if the vaccine manufacturers themselves were to have made that same advertising claim, they could be sued for fraud.

In the next video clip, a professor of ethics in Canada explained how her university was acting unethically by firing her for declining COVID-19 vaccination.

In the discussion that follows, I explain how the vaccines have not been shown to have a mortality benefit. I also emphasize the importance of remaining vigilant and doing everything we can collectively to ensure that this can never happen again. Polls show we are moving in the right direction, but Democrats appear generally delusional, placing more trust in the CDC now than they did before the pandemic. I share the sage piece of advice I received from William Blum, author of Killing Hope and Rogue State, about how to deal with people who seem impervious to facts.

Government officials do not have the knowledge necessary to be able to conduct a meaningful risk-benefit analysis for vaccination on behalf of every individual. The government’s unscientific one-size-fits-all approach, including with childhood vaccines, results in the systematic violation of the right to informed consent.

Lastly, Nate shares a clip of comedian and political commentator Bill Maher in 2009 talking about how there is a need for an honest public discussion about the benefits and risks of vaccinations.

That segued into a discussion about flu shots, like how in 1976 a fear campaign was used to get people to accept a rapidly developed pandemic swine flu vaccine. The vaccine ended up being all risk and no benefit because the forewarned pandemic never occurred. That shot was later shown to be associated with an increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), a polio-like paralytic disease. Then there was the pandemic H1N1 flu shot rolled out in Europe in 2009, which was shown to be associated with an increased risk of narcolepsy, an autoimmune disease in which the part of the brain regulating the sleep-wake cycle becomes dysfunctional. I also explain in the interview how I was able to accurately warn about the problem of original antigenic sin with COVID‑19 vaccines due to my prior research into flu shots.

Yet, to criticize public vaccine policy is to commit heresy against the vaccine religion. I explain how it can be possible, without there being a need to propose any kind of conspiracy theory, that the entire “public health” establishment is wrong about vaccines.

I end by explaining how the CDC brazenly lies about its own cited sources, with examples from the CDC’s webpage claiming that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”.

While published on June 29, this interview was recorded on May 11, so you’ll hear me refer to what was at the time a forthcoming e-book, which I published later that month. Get it here: The New York Times vs. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: How the Mainstream Media Spread Vaccine Misinformation.