Table of Contents
Compliance by Design
The so-called “public health” establishment is geared toward the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry instead of the goal of a healthy population. A consequence of this corrupt system is the systematic violation of individuals’ right to informed consent to vaccinations.
I have joined Paul Lobosco and Dr. Richard Margolis from the organization American Health Revolution for a multi-part discussion this critical issue.
In part one, which you can watch here, we discussed the concept of informed choice, the failed legal framework in which this right is supposed to be protected, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the FDA approval process, the problem of institutionalized bias, and more.
We are now pleased to bring you part two, which provides more essential knowledge about the problems and the societal changes needed to solve them.
Part two is aptly titled “Compliance by Design: Corporate Power, Medical Ethics, and the Information Battlefield”. In it, we delved even deeper into numerous of the topics raised in part one, such as the role of corrupt medical trade organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).
Watch this important conversation:
Topics Covered in This Interview
- How the Nuremberg Code relates to today’s battle over informed consent
- Why informed consent cannot exist under conditions of coercion, deception, or institutional pressure to comply
- How public vaccine policy shifts the goal from informed choice to obedience
- Why the risk-benefit analysis for vaccination must be individualized, not dictated by centralized policy
- How The War on Informed Consent tells the story of Dr. Paul Thomas’s persecution by the Oregon Medical Board
- Why Dr. Thomas was treated as a threat not to public health, but to the public health establishment
- How medical licensing can be weaponized to enforce compliance with official policy
- Why the retraction of Dr. Thomas’s vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study reveals a glaring double standard in “the science”
- How the Henry Ford vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study was suppressed despite following the CDC’s own proposed framework
- Why An Inconvenient Study exposed something the media and “fact-checkers” don’t want the public to understand
- How the phrase “the science is settled” betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of science
- Why public support for informed consent often disappears when the subject turns specifically to vaccines
- How the “vaccine religion” functions through appeals to belief, trust, and obedience rather than open scientific inquiry
- Why non-specific effects of vaccines and all-cause mortality must be considered in any honest safety analysis
- How studies on the DTP vaccine challenge the simplistic claim that vaccines only produce beneficial effects
- Why opportunity costs—including the loss of superior natural immunity—must be part of the vaccine risk-benefit discussion
- How rising health care spending has failed to produce better health outcomes
- Why the absence of real market prices in health care is central to the system’s dysfunction
- How the American Academy of Pediatrics helps enforce vaccine orthodoxy while presenting itself as a neutral medical authority
- Why pediatricians may face financial and professional pressure to push the recommended vaccine schedule
- How the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act transformed the vaccine industry’s incentives
- Why the government functions less like a neutral regulator of the vaccine industry than a partner in its success
- How recent federal vaccine policy changes represent only a modest step toward “shared decision-making”
- Why the AAP’s lawsuit against HHS illustrates the power struggle over who gets to control vaccine decisions
- What parents can do when vaccine mandates conflict with their conscience, medical judgment, or understanding of the evidence
- How Michigan’s vaccine exemption law became part of my own family’s battle over informed consent
- Why meaningful change must come from the grassroots rather than from top-down political reform
- How the health freedom movement differs from the partisan branding of MAHA
- Why the issue is not “pro-vaccine” versus “anti-vaccine,” but whether individual rights will be respected
- How artificial intelligence could become either a tool for individual empowerment or a mechanism of population control
- Why taking back our power requires a moral commitment to truth, courage, and action
- How restoring sound money could help address many of the systemic problems caused by government interference in health care
Related Research and Articles
Newsletter Signup & Free e-Book
Book
- The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical Board by Jeremy R. Hammond, Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Papers
- Hviid et al. 2019 Vaccine-Autism Study: Much Ado About Nothing?
- Aluminium adjuvants and childhood health: a call for science
Articles
- UN Document: COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Are Not About Public Health
- Vaccine Mandates Are an Unethical and Unlawful Violation of Human Rights
- How Public Vaccine Policy Violates Our Right to Informed Consent
- How Michigan Schools Unlawfully Deny Enrollment of Unvaccinated Children
- Michigan Democrats Aim to Deny Parents Vaccine Exemptions
- Expelled by Pediatricians for Declining CDC’s Vaccine Schedule
- Breakthrough Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier
- Scientific Data Show Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier
- Top Researcher into ‘Non-Specific Effects’ of Vaccines: RFK Jr. Is Right about DTP Vaccine
- Natural Immunity Is an Opportunity Cost of COVID-19 Vaccination
- How Medical Licensing Serves Big Pharma at the Expense of Public Health
- Why RFK Jr’s Wearables Push Is Raising Alarm Among Health Freedom and Privacy Advocates
- The AAP’s Lawsuit Against RFK, Jr: Much Ado about Nothing
- The Great MAHA™ Glyphosate Betrayal
