The US-Israeli War on Iran Is Illegal and Immoral
Americans choosing to support Trump’s criminal aggression have allowed themselves to be deceived by routine war propaganda.
Americans choosing to support Trump’s criminal aggression have allowed themselves to be deceived by routine war propaganda.
While Israel fuels violent protests in Iran, the US is citing the Iranian government’s deadly crackdown as a pretext for a military attack aimed at regime change.
Health freedom advocates are faced with a choice this election of whether they believe that all children’s lives matter, or not.
I responded to arguments from a Zionist in this interview on the causes of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The New York Times persists in propagating the unevidenced conspiracy theory that the Russian government hacked into US election infrastructure in 2016.
The New York Times reports as fact that Russia hacked the 2016 US presidential election despite failing to present any evidence to support this claim.
Iraq war architect Paul Wolfowitz charges Assad with deliberately supporting ISIS in Syria, but his argument is even more applicable to the US.
John McCain's solution to the tragedy in Syria is to continue doing the same things that caused the rise of ISIS in the first place.
The HBO documentary film Cries from Syria doesn’t tell the whole story about the so-called “Civil War” there, but it does highlight the most critical part.
John Kerry hails the Obama administration's "assertive diplomacy" as though the US's policies under his two terms wasn't the opposite of diplomacy.
Hillary Clinton knows a no-fly zone in Syria would necessitate killing a lot of Syrian civilians, but she advocates one anyway.
Press TV asks me about US airstrikes in Libya, and I point out that doing more of what caused the rise of ISIS in the first place won't solve the problem.
The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" Glenn Kessler responds to Donald Trump's remarks about how ISIS came to be. How does his own version hold up?
The Habilian Association, and Iranian self-described "Human Rights NGO", censors criticisms of the Iranian regime's rights violations for its audience.
The New York Times tosses previously reported facts down the memory hole, whitewashing the US's role in Syria leading ultimately to the rise of ISIS.
The terrorist attacks in Paris, France, have served to manufacture even further consent for the US's disastrous policy in Syria.
Reuters presents the standard fictional narrative that the Obama administration has been reluctant to intervene in Syria.
The goal of the Obama administration's policy towards Syria remains to prolong the violence.
The New York Times, in keeping with its standard propaganda narrative, once again whitewashes the US support for Syrian armed rebels in a recent editorial.
Danny Postel and Nader Hashemi argue in a New York Times op-ed that the international community should invoke the "Responsibility to Protect" principle to intervene in Syria but unwittingly illustrate why this is a dangerous doctrine.
Roger Cohen argues in a recent New York Times column that U.S. "disengagement" has been disastrous for Egypt even while citing facts illustrating that precisely the opposite is true.
The New York Times admits that its earlier claim that Assad was responsible for the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack in Syria was baseless.
Last week, the New York Times reported that the U.S. was temporarily suspending "nonlethal" aid to the rebels after the Syrian Islamic Front coalition of jihadist groups raided warehouses where U.S.-supplied materials intended for the Free Syrian Army (FSA) were being stored. But the London-based Asharq Al-Awsat provides a different story...
The great Seymour M. Hersh has an article in the London Review of Books about the Obama administrations efforts to manufacture a pretext to bomb Syria by blaming the Augst 21 chemical weapons attack in Damascus on the Bashar al-Assad regime despite knowing that rebel forces were capable of producing the nerve agent.
The U.S. mainstream media has a rather strange understanding of what "diplomacy" in international relations means. Under the headline "Obama Signals a Shift From Military Might to Diplomacy", Mark Landler in the New York Times offers two problematic examples that are somehow supposed to support this thesis: Iran and Syria.
As usual, the New York Times is spinning information to willfully obfuscate the role of the U.S. in arming Syrian rebels whose ranks include al-Qaeda-affiliated and other Islamic extremist groups, with most of the arms falling into the hands of the jihadists.
One of the U.S. government's main arguments for why we are supposed to have concluded that Syrian government forces were responsible for the August chemical weapons attack in Damascus is that the rebels being armed by the U.S. whose ranks include al-Qaeda...
Yesterday, October 7, marked 40 years since the beginning of the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, so naturally the mainstream media has been unashamedly busy propagating the fictional Zionist narrative.
What Americans mustn't be naive about is their own government and the false pretexts it uses to manufacture consent for its policies.
U.N. investigators were able to determine from what trajectory the CW rockets were fired, and the azimuths could be traced back to the direction of Qasioun Mountain, where Syrian military bases are located.

I am an independent researcher, journalist, and author dedicated to exposing mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.
I write about critically important issues including US foreign policy, economic policy, and so-called "public health" policies.
My books include Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent.
To learn more about my mission and core values, visit my About page.