LinkedIn Prohibits Correction of CDC Vaccine Disinformation

The social media website LinkedIn has been maintaining a policy of effectively violating its own terms of use with users by removing posts providing factually accurate information to correct false claims about vaccines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

This policy thus effectively prohibits journalism to correct government-approved disinformation about vaccine safety and effectiveness.

In my latest experience with LinkedIn’s censorship, I had shared an article of mine published in December 2022 titled “How the CDC Lies about the Safety of Aluminum in Vaccines“.

In that article, I explained why pharmaceutical companies use aluminum in many vaccines, what the CDC says about how allegedly “safe” this is, and how the key study the CDC relies on to support that claim renders the claim scientifically fraudulent.

That study, by Robert J. Mitkus et al., was done by researchers from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

My article demonstrates in detail how that study does not support the CDC’s claim that it is “safe” for infants to receive the cumulative levels of aluminum they are exposed to by its routine childhood vaccination schedule.

I explained how it is typical for vaccine “safety” studies used by manufacturers to gain FDA licensure to use another aluminum-containing injection instead of a true placebo.

I showed how the “minimal risk level” used by the FDA to support the claim of safety was based on a single study of ingested aluminum in adult mice, thus greatly overestimating the “safe” level of aluminum being injected into human infants.

The study also used a water-soluble form of aluminum, which fails to establish the safety of insoluble aluminum particles from vaccinations.

I explained how Mitkus et al. fallaciously assumed that aluminum particles from vaccines do not contribute to the “body burden” of aluminum toxicity. They considered only aluminum in the blood as contributing to the body burden while completely ignoring the toxicity of aluminum particles that accumulate in organs like the kidneys, liver, and brain.

When I make errors in my articles and they are pointed out to me, I am happy to correct them. Since I published that article in 2022, nobody has pointed out to me any factual or logical errors in it.

But after I shared that article recently on LinkedIn, it was removed on the grounds that it violated LinkedIn’s community guidelines prohibiting “misinformation”. Here is the post that was removed:

LinkedIn claims to have an “appeal” process for users who have a post that their “automated systems” flag as being in violation of their community guidelines.

But there is no legitimate appeal process.

Instead, all you can do is to “submit an appeal”, which inevitably results in LinkedIn affirming its claim that your post violates its guidelines.

I detailed how that faux “appeal” process works and how LinkedIn effectively violates its own terms of use in my September 2023 article “LinkedIn Censors DNA Contamination in mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines“.

You are never provided with an explanation from LinkedIn what information contained in your post they are alleging is false or misleading, and hence you are never provided with an opportunity to defend yourself against their accusation.

Their “appeal” process involves absolutely no examination of the actual content or the facts. They just make a claim, and you have absolutely no legitimate opportunity to actually challenge their accusation.

Here is the predictable outcome of my latest so-called “appeal”:

I have previously had numerous posts removed under the pretext that they contained “misinformation”. In fact, I was even “permanently” banned by LinkedIn for this alleged violation of their community guidelines and hence of their terms of use.

My chief sin in that case was repeatedly trying to share my February 2022 article “The CDC Finally Admits That Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 Is Superior to the Immunity Induced by COVID-19 Vaccines“, which documented how the CDC’s August 2021 claim that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines conferred protection that was superior to natural immunity was contradicted at the time by virtually all of the non-CDC-originating medical literature and was subsequently falsified by the CDC’s own data as reported by its own researchers in its own MMWR journal.

In that case, too, I told the truth that the CDC had lied, but LinkedIn won’t allow you to tell that truth.

LinkedIn claims that such posts violate its community guidelines, which state the following (emphasis added):

Do not share false or misleading content: Do not share content that is false, misleading, or intended to deceive. Do not share content to interfere with or improperly influence an election or other civic process. Do not share synthetic or manipulated media that depicts a person saying something they did not say or doing something they did not do without clearly disclosing the fake or altered nature of the material. Do not share content that directly contradicts guidance from leading global health organizations and public health authorities; including false information about the safety or efficacy of vaccines or medical treatments.

Thus, LinkedIn defines any information that contradicts the CDC’s vaccine recommendations as “false or misleading”, no matter how factually accurate and well-supported by the scientific literature that information is.

According to LinkedIn, whatever the CDC says is gospel truth, and it is infallible in its policymaking and in its public relations messaging.

This is the nature of the vaccine religion.

Even when you can cite the CDC’s own data to demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt how the CDC lies to the public to manufacture consent for its policy goal of achieving a high vaccination rate, LinkedIn by default considers such reporting “misinformation”.

During previous “appeal” processes, I did manage to actually communicate with a person, and I repeatedly requested LinkedIn to specify what information I shared that they were claiming to be “false or misleading”. In every instance, they refused.

Most instructively, when I specifically asked LinkedIn whether its guidelines prohibited me from reporting factual accurate information correcting provable disinformation from “public health” authorities like the CDC, LinkedIn’s instructive response was that it does not provide “interpretations” of its guidelines.

In other words, “Yes, our community guidelines prohibit you from sharing factually accurate information that contradicts government-approved disinformation about vaccines.”

That, of course, constitutes fraud in terms of LinkedIn’s terms of use with users.

LinkedIn basically violates its own terms of use by falsely accusing you of violating its prohibition against “misinformation” and falsely promising an “appeal” process to anyone who has a post removed on the grounds of having violated its community guidelines.

It’s a scam, and someone with the necessary resources should sue LinkedIn for this violation of its own terms of use. (I’d be more than happy to help in whatever way I can with that lawsuit.)

The censorship has, of course, been going on for a long time. Social media companies serve the state by prohibiting you from telling the truth, thus enabling the government to propagate its demonstrable disinformation.

Professional propagandists masquerading as “journalists” similarly treat the CDC as infallible, its proclamations as gospel truth.

This is the face of the vaccine religion.

Similarly, there are professional propagandists masquerading as scientists who serve the same function.

An instructive example is a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), which literally defined any information that was contrary to that provided by the CDC as “misinformation”, no matter how preposterous and demonstrably false the CDC’s claim.

This illuminates the cult of vaccination. It’s not about science. It’s a matter of faith.

To dive into that case study in how propaganda works, see my September 2023 article “‘Study’ on COVID-19 ‘Misinformation’ Propagates CDC Misinformation“.

The censorship of truly independent journalism has greatly impacted my ability to get the truth out. It is absolutely essential for news consumers like you to participate.

Together, we can make a positive impact and create a better world for our children and future generations of humanity, but it requires action.

I am doing what I can to help others discern truth from lies, but I cannot continue to do this without your support.

Of course, one of the best ways you can help, if you are able, is to provide financial support to truth tellers.

However, there are numerous other ways you can help support independent journalism that don’t cost anything more than a few moments of your time.

See here for more ways you can help: