How You Are Being Lied to about the Risks of DNA Contamination in COVID-19 Vaccines

Listen to This Article

How the “Public Health” Establishment Lied about Everything Covid-Related

Throughout the government’s public relations campaign to achieve the policy goal of a high vaccination rate for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the public was consistently lied to by government officials, by the mainstream media and its faux “fact check” industry, and by the pharmaceutical establishment masquerading as a “health care” system.

From the start, the endgame of the lockdown madness was coerced mass vaccination.[1] Government officials lied that they were “following the science” despite having absolutely no scientific basis for their aim of deliberately shutting down the economy and trampling individuals’ rights.

Naturally, since it was always a lie, the proclaimed benefits of the lockdowns never manifested in the data, while the harms caused by these criminal policies to the economy and to people’s physical and mental health will continue to be felt for generations to come.[2]

Despite an abundance of evidence indicating that SARS‑CoV‑2, the coronavirus that causes COVID‑19, was created in a laboratory, the propaganda narrative dismissed the legitimate scientific hypothesis of a lab-origin as a baseless “conspiracy theory”.[3]

Contrary to the propaganda narrative, the claim of a natural spillover event lacks supporting evidence, and we now know that Dr. Anthony Fauci in his role as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which funded risky “gain of function” research on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, where the outbreak first occurred, was involved in an orchestrated cover-up of the probable lab origin.[4]

The explicitly stated aim of the NIH-funded research was to develop a vaccine against the very viral threat that they were working to create in the lab, which experiments were ostensibly being done to “predict” what virus would next emerge in nature and spillover into the human population to cause a global pandemic.[5]

Throughout the summer and fall of 2020, we were bombarded with statist propaganda falsely claiming that natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2 was weak and short-lived, the transparent aim of which was to create fear in furtherance of the policy goal of getting people to consent to being injected with an experimental mRNA vaccine.[6]

Government “health” agencies, the media’s faux “fact check” industry, and health care providers brazenly lied that the mRNA vaccines were “approved” by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020, when in fact these products had instead received “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA), which is a regulatory status explicitly for FDA-unapproved products that are considered “experimental” or “investigational”.[7]

Efforts by truth-tellers to correct the record were met by orchestrated efforts to censor the facts and hence to better accommodate the spread of government-approved disinformation.

For example, we were treated by the government and faux “fact checkers” to the ridiculous claim that “COVID-19 vaccines are more effective than natural immunity”.[8] That claim, which originated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), was contradicted at the time by virtually all of the non-CDC-originating scientific literature and was subsequently falsified by the CDC’s own data reported by the agency’s own researchers in its own MMWR journal.[9]

For accurately summarizing what the medical literature told us about natural versus vaccine-induced immunity and accurately reporting the findings of that CDC study, I was banned from LinkedIn.[10]

Both before and after the vaccines were rolled out to the public, the “public health” establishment was unified in their chorus that these products would end the pandemic by conferring herd immunity. Two doses of an mRNA COVID‑19 vaccine, we were told, would induce durable sterilizing immunity that would stop infection and transmission of SARS‑CoV‑2.

That was a brazen lie completely unsupported by scientific evidence, as I was pointing out at the time.[11] But after it became obvious from the data that the claim was untrue, the media’s faux “fact checkers” tried to gaslight us into forgetting that government officials had brazenly lied to the public about COVID‑19 vaccine effectiveness in order to persuade people to accept the experimental mRNA pharmaceutical products called “vaccines” but in fact developed using gene therapy technology.[12]

When the FDA authorized mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines for use in infants and toddlers, it did so on the basis of demonstrable scientific fraud, as I documented extensively in my freely downloadable e-book The FDA, COVID‑19 Vaccines, and Scientific Fraud: How the US Government Puts Children’s Health at Risk in Service to the Pharmaceutical Industry.[13]

Another lie we were constantly told by the “public health” and mainstream media establishments was that the mRNA from the vaccines, along with the SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein that the mRNA causes human cells to produce, are rapidly eliminated from the body “within days”.

The spike protein, we were constantly told, is “harmless”, and most of the mRNA stays in the injection site muscle.

In fact, it is well established in the scientific literature that, in the absence of whole viable virus, the spike protein by itself is pathogenic; the mRNA is transported into tissues and organs throughout the body; and studies have shown that both vaccine mRNA and spike protein can persist in the body for months.[14] One study showed persistence of the spike protein in the blood six months after vaccination.[15]

A related lie that we have been constantly treated to is that there is absolutely no cause for concern about the vaccines altering human DNA. We continue to be told that scientists know that it is biologically impossible for genetic material from the vaccines to become integrated into human DNA.

However, the arguments used to support that conclusion consist of logical fallacies. The CDC, for example, has maintained that since the mRNA never enters the cell nucleus, where the DNA resides, it cannot possibly become integrated.

But that argument is a non sequitur fallacy. The conclusion does not follow from the premise because there is a long-known phenomenon by which mRNA can be “reverse transcribed” into DNA, which can then potentially enter the cell nucleus and become integrated into host DNA.

In the rare instances in which the “fact checkers” acknowledged the process of reverse transcription, the argument used to maintain the conclusion that there’s absolutely nothing to worry about was that the mRNA vaccines do not encode for the reverse transcriptase enzyme required for reverse transcription into DNA to occur, so that cannot possibly happen.[16]

But what the faux “fact checkers” failed to inform the public is that the body creates its own reverse transcriptase enzymes. The fallacious nature of their argument was starkly illuminated in a lab study demonstrating the reverse transcription of vaccine mRNA into DNA in human liver cancer cells.[17]

Moreover, a discovery was made last year by genomics expert Kevin McKernan that reverse transcription of vaccine mRNA into DNA may not even be necessary because the vaccines are contaminated with plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process at levels greatly exceeding the FDA’s own safety limits.[18]

McKernan’s findings have since been replicated by numerous other researchers, including the authors of a study published earlier this month in the journal Methods and Protocols.[19] That there is DNA contamination in mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines is now an established fact acknowledged by governmental “regulatory” agencies, including the FDA, Health Canada, and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).[20]

So, what has been the authoritarian establishment’s response to this discovery? Simple. They have sought to censor information about the finding of DNA contamination and, to the very limited extent that this information has made its way into the public discourse, they have persisted in brazenly lying that the DNA contamination poses absolutely no risk whatsoever.[21]

I demonstrated the ridiculousness of an attempt by the New York Times to dismiss legitimate concerns about this discovery in my recent article, “New York Times Deceives about Risks from DNA Contamination in mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines”.

To reiterate just one example from that article, the Times falsely claims that there is no possible mechanism by which foreign DNA can become integrated into human DNA, even though this possibility is well acknowledged in the scientific literature.

Indeed, it is precisely because of this risk that regulatory agencies have specified safety limits for residual DNA from the manufacturing process. If there were no health risks from contaminant DNA, then why set safety limits? The claim that there is no such risk is prima facia absurd.

The reporting of America’s “newspaper of record”, the New York Times, provides one illustration of how the mainstream media serve the propaganda function of manufacturing consent for criminal government policies, including policies resulting in the systematic violation of individuals’ right to informed consent.[22]

Another useful illustration of how the mainstream media dutifully spread government-approved disinformation comes from the supposedly science-based magazine Scientific American.

“You have a ‘better chance of becoming Spider-Man’ than being harmed by DNA from COVID vaccines”, mocked Scientific American on January 4 in an article written by senior editor Tanya Lewis.[23]

Lewis’s pretense that it is ludicrous to think that there could possibly be any legitimate concerns about the DNA contamination simply illustrates how professional propagandists masquerading as science journalists collude with the pharmaceutical industry and the government to systematically deceive the public about matters of vaccine safety.