...

The US War on Iraq

How the US government waged a devastating and illegal war of aggression based on lies.

Prior to the US invasion of Iraq in March 2003, I was warning people how the US government was lying about Saddam Hussein having weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and operative ties to Al Qaeda, and how this campaign of deception was being waged against the American people to manufacture consent for this illegal war of aggression.

The war was waged not to “free” the Iraqi people from an evil dictator but to advance the neocons’ foreign policy agenda of establishing US global hegemony and facilitating Israel’s land theft and oppression of the Palestinian people.

Here is a collection of articles related to the war and US policy toward Iraq.

Deconstructing the Official Narrative on the U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq

raq is back in the news, at least for a moment. The occasion is "A truly historic end to seven years of war", in the words of Lt. Col Mark Beiger, quoted in the Washington Post, referring to the final withdrawal of "combat" troops from the...

U.S. Foreign Policy for Dummies

Look. It's not that difficult, okay? Point one: Politicians don't often say what they mean. Point two: Politicians don't often mean what they say. As corollary of the first two points, point three: Policy is rightly judged by deeds, not words.

Donald Rumsfeld shakes hands with Saddam Hussein in 1983.

Whoever Wins U.S. Election, Policy in ‘War on Terror’ Unlikely to Change

Both the Democratic and Republican U.S. presidential candidates have stated their intention to increase the military presence in Afghanistan should they win the election to become the country’s next Executive. As a recent article in the Washington Post observed,...

Pretexts for War

The US has a long history of waging war on false pretexts.

General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, November 16, 1967 (US Department of Defense/Public Domain)

The Reasons for Regime Change in Iraq

Many analysts argue that the 2003 US war for regime change in Iraq was waged for Israel, but its neocon architects viewed benefits for Israel as incidental.

Richard Perle appearing on "After Dark", June 10, 1989. (Open Media Ltd / Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Framework for Debate on Iran

As with Iraq, the issue is not about weapons of mass destruction or failed obligations under existing treaties, but about ensuring U.S. credibility in its pursuit of global hegemony.

Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei (seysd shahaboddin vajedi/CC BY 4.0)
About the Author

About the Author

I am an independent researcher, journalist, and author dedicated to exposing mainstream propaganda that serves to manufacture consent for criminal government policies.

I write about critically important issues including US foreign policy, economic policy, and so-called "public health" policies.

My books include Obstacle to Peace: The US Role in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, and The War on Informed Consent.

To learn more about my mission and core values, visit my About page.

>